On 11/10/2010 11:22 AM, Ian Molton wrote:
> Ping ?
I think the best way forward is to post patches.
To summarize what I was trying to express in the thread, I think this is
not the right long term architecture but am not opposed to it as a short
term solution. I think having a new virtio devic
Ping ?
On 05/11/10 18:05, Ian Molton wrote:
> On 03/11/10 18:17, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 11/03/2010 01:03 PM, Ian Molton wrote:
>
>> Why is it better than using virtio-serial?
>
> For one thing, it enforces the PID in kernel so the guests processes
> cant screw each other over by forging the
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
> ---
> drivers/video/arcfb.c | 5 ++---
> drivers/video/broadsheetfb.c | 4 +---
> drivers/video/hecubafb.c | 5 ++---
> drivers/video/metronomefb.c | 4 +---
> drivers/video/xen-fbfront.c
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 04:50:29 pm Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The sysfs files for virtio produce the wrong format and are missing
> the required newline. The output for virtio bus vendor/device should
> have the same format as the corresponding entries for PCI devices.
>
> Although this technically c
