On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:00:37PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> But re your comment that the 67 drivers using TX_BUSY are doing it because of
> driver bugs, that's hard to believe. It either hardly ever happens (in which
> case just drop the packet), or it happens (in which case we should ha
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 02:52:47 pm Herbert Xu wrote:
> No you've misunderstood my complaint. I'm not trying to get you
> to replace NETDEV_TX_BUSY by the equally abhorrent queue in the
> driver, I'm saying that you should stop the queue before you get
> a packet that overflows by looking at the amount
Signed-off-by: Huang Weiyi
---
drivers/xen/evtchn.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/evtchn.c b/drivers/xen/evtchn.c
index af03195..79bedba 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/evtchn.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/evtchn.c
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
#include
#include
#in
