Corosync and Pacemaker with Jails. Is it worth the effort?

Hello, Are these cluster tools actually usable on FBSD and in Jails? I got a 3 way PostgreSQL cluster with floating IPs to _mostly_ work across 3 Bastille-based jails but the whole process has been very painful, so I'm wondering if this stuff is actually usable on FBSD or am I just wasting my tim

Dockerfile to Bastille interpreter/translator

I understand there's an ongoing effort to support Linux Docker images "natively" through amd64 translation layer to the FBSD kernel. I think that is a great endeavour but it got me thinking that perhaps there's an alternative way to leverage the full power of FBSD and Bastille. If you look at Dock

Re: Dockerfile to Bastille interpreter/translator

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:34 AM Zhenlei Huang wrote: .. > > So my question is, has anybody thought or have started work on an > Dockerfile interpreter that can build native Bastille/ZFS "images" from a > Dockerfile ? > > If I read you right, you may look at buildah / podman, and the runtime >

If we are so opposed to Docker and Kubernetes, what is the real alternative on BSD?

I made the title provocative for a flame but in good faith, so hear me out ;-) Being a FreeBSD user for many years I perfectly understand why supporting Docker is useless outside of virtualization or just for fun. I only put it in the subject to get your attention. But can the same be said of Kub

Re: If we are so opposed to Docker and Kubernetes, what is the real alternative on BSD?

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:40 PM Odhiambo Washington wrote: .. > You're missing the fact that you could virtualize a Linux host and run all > those Docker/k8s inside it and just proxy access to them. > For example, I am running https://ushahidi.kictanet.or.ke/views/map > inside an Ubuntu VM under

Re: If we are so opposed to Docker and Kubernetes, what is the real alternative on BSD?

8s expert not sure if runj counts as an alternative to k8s or more like container runtime for k8s. Would be nice that actual k8s experts could chime in here ... > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:40 PM Odhiambo Washington > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024

Re: If we are so opposed to Docker and Kubernetes, what is the real alternative on BSD?

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:56 PM Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi all, > > > Am 01.02.2024 um 15:47 schrieb Alejandro Imass : > > IMO, the issue is not so much the container tech, we invented that in > the first place. The issue is not having a decent orchestrator / > autoscal

Re: If we are so opposed to Docker and Kubernetes, what is the real alternative on BSD?

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 4:05 PM Mario Marietto wrote: > ---> I understand that Linux native containers can already run on BSD with > the Linuxulator layer. > > Docker can't run on the linuxulator. Curious to see if kubernetes and or > runj do it. Me too I know that native code is better,but I know

Re: If we are so opposed to Docker and Kubernetes, what is the real alternative on BSD?

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 12:40 AM Mario Marietto wrote: > Excuse me. I'm not very experienced,but isn't the L4 or any other > microkernel a valid alternative to containers ? If I have understood > correctly how it works,it allows multiple instances of the various services > implemented within the m

Re: If we are so opposed to Docker and Kubernetes, what is the real alternative on BSD?

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 2:29 PM Mario Marietto wrote: > Alejandro,I'm not sure if you are aware that the discussion at a certain > point has broadened and deepened. I don't understand why I can't propose > an alternative to the actual jail and jail managers that you are talking > about. And no. On