Re: 14R bhyve RHEL9+NVME

2024-02-13 Thread Matthew Grooms
On 2/11/24 19:25, Jason Tubnor wrote: Hi Matthew, There is some underlying bug post 9.1 when it comes to Anaconda and the presented NVMe storage. I can't reproduce it with newer version of Anaconda that is present in Fedora. Uplifting in place from 9.1 to 9.3, there are no issues once the o

Re: 14R bhyve RHEL9+NVME

2024-02-11 Thread Chuck Tuffli
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024, at 5:25 PM, Jason Tubnor wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > There is some underlying bug post 9.1 when it comes to Anaconda and the > presented NVMe storage. I can't reproduce it with newer version of Anaconda > that is present in Fedora. > > Uplifting in place from 9.1 to 9.3,

Re: 14R bhyve RHEL9+NVME

2024-02-11 Thread Jason Tubnor
Hi Matthew,   There is some underlying bug post 9.1 when it comes to Anaconda and the presented NVMe storage. I can't reproduce it with newer version of Anaconda that is present in Fedora.   Uplifting in place from 9.1 to 9.3, there are no issues once the operating system is up and running, so i

14R bhyve RHEL9+NVME

2024-02-11 Thread Matthew Grooms
Hey All, Has anyone had experience installing either Rocky or Alma Linux 9.3 using virtual NVME disks on a FreeBSD 14R host? I have no problem using VirtIO block devices or if I downgrade to an 8.9 variant. However, using NVME with a 9.3 variant will cause the installer to consistently fail on