Hi Rebecca and Peter,
thank you very much for your feedback.
Best regards
Corvin
Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG | Managing Director: Dipl. Phys. Hans Beckhoff
Registered office: Verl, Germany | Register court: Guetersloh HRA 7075
On 4/7/22 3:24 PM, Corvin Köhne wrote:
Hi Peter and Rebecca,
thanks for your feedback. This patch is backward compatible. It checks
if QemuFwCfg is available and if QemuFwCfg is missing it falls
back to BhyveFwCtl.
So, should I add Reviewed-by (or Acked-by?) Peter and Rebecca to the
commit mess
Hi Mario,
> im trying to test the patch on my pc,that has two graphic cards,the
> intel coffee lake and the nvidia. i tried to start the pc from the
> nvidia card and ive configured the xorg.conf file giving the
> proper bus id value. in addition ive loaded the kernel.ko file
> from the boot loade
im trying to test the patch on my pc,that has two graphic cards,the intel
coffee lake and the nvidia. i tried to start the pc from the nvidia card
and ive configured the xorg.conf file giving the proper bus id value. in
addition ive loaded the kernel.ko file from the boot loader.conf i have
removed
I've just looked at the patch and it looks good, though I haven't tested it.
So yes, please add:
Acked-by: Rebecca Cran
On 4/6/22 23:24, Corvin Köhne wrote:
Hi Peter and Rebecca,
thanks for your feedback. This patch is backward compatible. It checks
if QemuFwCfg is available and if QemuFwC
Hi Peter and Rebecca,
thanks for your feedback. This patch is backward compatible. It checks
if QemuFwCfg is available and if QemuFwCfg is missing it falls
back to BhyveFwCtl.
So, should I add Reviewed-by (or Acked-by?) Peter and Rebecca to the
commit message?
Thanks
Corvin
Beckhoff Automation
[re-posting from my personal email account, since my mail to > freebsd-virtualization got rejected]> > I seem to remember seeing
previous feedback that Bhyve developers > strongly preferred the
BhyveFwCtl mechanism. I've been out of the loop > though (busy with
$dayjob) so I don't know if thing
[re-posting from my personal email account, since my mail to
freebsd-virtualization got rejected]
I seem to remember seeing previous feedback that Bhyve developers
strongly preferred the BhyveFwCtl mechanism. I've been out of the loop
though (busy with $dayjob) so I don't know if things have c
