oVirt storage domains can be in various states (inactive, in
maintainance, ...). We only want to show the ISOs it contains in the
foreign menu when the storage domain is actually active, not in the
other states.
---
src/ovirt-foreign-menu.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> oVirt storage domains can be in various states (inactive, in
> maintainance, ...). We only want to show the ISOs it contains in the
> foreign menu when the storage domain is actually active, not in the
> other states.
No bug references?
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:40:23PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Christophe Fergeau
> wrote:
> > oVirt storage domains can be in various states (inactive, in
> > maintainance, ...). We only want to show the ISOs it contains in the
> > foreign menu when the stora
On 03/01/2016 10:36 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> oVirt storage domains can be in various states (inactive, in
> maintainance, ...). We only want to show the ISOs it contains in the
> foreign menu when the storage domain is actually active, not in the
> other states.
> ---
> src/ovirt-foreign-me
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:55:48PM -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 10:36 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > oVirt storage domains can be in various states (inactive, in
> > maintainance, ...). We only want to show the ISOs it contains in the
> > foreign menu when the storage dom
Virt-install on kvm provides boot loader options for UEFI rather than BIOS.
There does not seem to be a similar option in virt-install on xen. Is there
another means for being UEFI-based on xen?
Thanks
___
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt-tools-list@
On 03/01/2016 11:21 AM, Clair Grant wrote:
> Virt-install on kvm provides boot loader options for UEFI rather than BIOS.
> There does not seem to be a similar option in virt-install on xen. Is there
> another means for being UEFI-based on xen?
>
Personally I have no idea what the state of xen +
On 03/01/2016 01:18 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:55:48PM -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
>> On 03/01/2016 10:36 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>>> oVirt storage domains can be in various states (inactive, in
>>> maintainance, ...). We only want to show the ISOs it
On 02/29/2016 03:01 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
> wrote:
>> On 02/26/2016 07:38 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>> Let's take advantage of GResource for loading ui files in a better and
>>> cleaner way than virt_viewer_util_load_ui() was doing
On 03/01/2016 01:18 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Cole Robinson wrote:
>> On 03/01/2016 11:21 AM, Clair Grant wrote:
>>> Virt-install on kvm provides boot loader options for UEFI rather than BIOS.
>>> There does not seem to be a similar option in virt-install on xen. Is there
>>> another means for bein
Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 11:21 AM, Clair Grant wrote:
>> Virt-install on kvm provides boot loader options for UEFI rather than BIOS.
>> There does not seem to be a similar option in virt-install on xen. Is there
>> another means for being UEFI-based on xen?
>>
>
> Personally I have n
Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 01:18 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>> Cole Robinson wrote:
>>> On 03/01/2016 11:21 AM, Clair Grant wrote:
Virt-install on kvm provides boot loader options for UEFI rather than
BIOS. There does not seem to be a similar option in virt-install on xen.
Is
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 23:38 +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> Let's take advantage of GResource for loading ui files in a better and
> cleaner way than virt_viewer_util_load_ui() was doing.
> It also brings the benefit, at least for developers, of being able to
> test ui changes without having to "m
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 23:38 +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>> Let's take advantage of GResource for loading ui files in a better and
>> cleaner way than virt_viewer_util_load_ui() was doing.
>> It also brings the benefit, at least for deve
Hi, if I use this patch, I cannot add a spice display device. I get an
error about "Graphics Device Parameter error, too many values to unpack"
and if I hit OK I get 'NoneType' object has no attribute
'virtual_device_type' Below is the virt-manager -debug log.
Thanks,
Sarnex
sarnex@pc ~ $ virt-ma
Hi guys, I'm having issues with spice and virgl. If I use virtio with
accel3d=yes and spice with gl=on, I get a black screen after a few seconds
of booting text. It works with SDL and GTK. If I disable either accel3d or
spice gl, it boots with virtio-gpu. The host is gentoo with mesa, spice,
spice-
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Nick Sarnie wrote:
> Hi guys, I'm having issues with spice and virgl. If I use virtio with
> accel3d=yes and spice with gl=on, I get a black screen after a few seconds
> of booting text. It works with SDL and GTK. If I disable either accel3d or
> spice gl, it boots
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Nick Sarnie wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Nick Sarnie
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys, I'm having issues with spice and virgl. If I use virtio with
>> accel3d=yes and spice with gl=on, I get a black screen after a few seconds
>> of booting text. It works with
oVirt storage domains can be in various states (inactive, in
maintainance, ...). We only want to show the ISOs it contains in the
foreign menu when the storage domain is actually active, not in the
other states.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310450
---
Changes since v1:
- added
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:59:38PM -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 01:18 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:55:48PM -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> >> On 03/01/2016 10:36 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> >>> oVirt storage domains can be in variou
20 matches
Mail list logo
