Hi,
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 19:05 +0300, Seppo Ingalsuo wrote:
> Asus Bravo 220 silent seems to be a passive model. Do you know if these
> non-motherboard integrated cards support 7.1ch PCM audio over HDMI?
Yes, as VDR User said, the latest generation VP4/VDPAU feature set C
cards (GeForce 210, GT
Hi Paul,
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 17:13 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> is there really no recommendation for a board not using Nvidia graphics
> components? It would really be great to not depend on proprietary
> drivers.
Hardware decoding through VA-API is working on some Intel chipsets and
CPUs, but
On Tue, 2010-08-17 kello 19:36 +0300, Seppo Ingalsuo wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:39 +0300, Niko Mikkilä wrote:
> > IMO the only reason to go for a separate card over ION would be higher
> > quality 1080i deinterlacing. You'll need GT 220 for that since GeForce
> > 2
Hi,
ke, 2010-08-18 kello 10:13 +0200, jori.hamalai...@teliasonera.com
kirjoitti:
> I also would like to remind the framerate issues. Naturally you decide what
> is enough precision and quality for you.
>
> Computer hardware usually cannot provide 50.000Hz, 59.940Hz or 23.976Hz
> outputs to your T
Thu, 2010-08-19 at 20:54 +0400, Goga777 wrote:
> > Computer hardware usually cannot provide 50.000Hz, 59.940Hz or 23.976Hz
> > outputs to your TV/Monitor. This will cause some judder on display output
> > as MPEG/AVC input-stream is not synchronized to output framerate.
>
> do you mean that all nv
Fri, 2010-08-20 at 10:30 +0300, Mikko Tuumanen wrote:
> I've just tried to use a tnt2 card with the nvidia legacy drivers
> because a couple of capacitors blew up on my newer card. It didn't work,
> undefined symbol. Same thing with ati cards.
The Nvidia legacy drivers are kept up to date with ke
Fri, 2010-08-20 at 10:08 +0200, jori.hamalai...@teliasonera.com wrote:
> > There is no graphics card, BD/DVD player or other standalone device that
> outputs
> > those rates exactly. I don't know how much they deviate, but I'd guess
> it's usually
> > something like 0.01 % (50.005 Hz instead of 5
Hi,
Sat, 2010-08-21 at 22:06 +0200, Stefan Lucke wrote:
> reststarting my vdr activities I went into trouble with dvb-t
> channels.conf for Berlin. Just took the channels from:
> http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/Channels.conf_DVBT-De-Berlin-Brandenburg
>
> There is the following entry for AR
Sun, 2010-08-22 at 11:51 +0200, marti...@embl.de wrote:
> You are absolutely right, the P4 has indeed 2.4GHz (and 512MB of RAM)
> Which makes it the more surprising that on SD channels I am getting cpu
> utilization in the region of 80% to 95%
> It should be a lot less?
What kind of deinterlacing
Wed, 2010-08-25 at 19:30 +0200, C.Scheeder wrote:
> I guess ProjectX will do the trick, it is scriptable.
> At least vdrconvert uses it this way to generate DVD-streams
> from VDR-recordings.
> the only downside is, it needs an X-server to run.
> (a real one or a fake one. vdrconvert uses a fake se
ate, but this is not always desirable.
Scripts
I wrote a bash script for downloading and installing AviSynth plus some
of the essential filters on Linux. I could upload it somewhere if people
are interested? There's also a simple command-line based template system
that makes using AviSyn
On 2010-11-08 at 12:54 +0200, Theunis Potgieter wrote:
> On 6 November 2010 14:14, Udo Richter wrote:
> > AMD also supports vaapi, but progress is very slow, and its still very
> > buggy. Also, its limited to closed source drivers.
>
> Sounds similar to what nvidia went through.
AMD's progress h
On 2010-11-29 at 18:58 +0100, Damien Bally wrote:
> Hello
>
> I plan to buy an D945GSEJT to build my new VDR box and I would give a
> try to the VGA2SCART (FRC) output. My TV-set is still a good old CRT.
>
> 1) Is the quality comparable to a dxr3 card which I am satisfied with ?
If you get FRC
On 2011-01-02 at 18:56 -0800, VDR User wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Adrian C. wrote:
> > Also with VDPAU, but more importantly in the absence of it would any of
> > these CPU be up to the task of processing: Athlon2 X3 450 3.2GHz and
> > Pentium E6500 or E6700 3.0GHz.
Those CPUs are f
On 2011-01-15 22:36 +, Tony Houghton wrote:
> I wonder whether it might be possible to use a more eonomical card
which
> is only powerful enough to decode 1080i without deinterlacing it and
> take advantage of the abundant CPU power most people have nowadays to
> perform software deinterlacing
On 2011-01-18 14:49 +, Tony Houghton wrote:
> I still can't translate that explanation into simple mechanics. Is
> temporal like weave and spatial like bob or the other way round? Or
> something a little more sophisticated, interpolating parts of the
> picture belonging to the "wrong" field fro
ke, 2011-01-19 kello 10:18 +, Stuart Morris kirjoitti:
> My experience with an nVidia GT220 has been less than perfect. It can
> perform temporal+spatial+inverse_telecine on HD video fast enough, but
> my PC gets hot and it truly sucks at 2:2 pulldown detection. The
> result of this is when vie
Replying to myself...
ke, 2011-01-19 kello 12:48 +0200, Niko Mikkilä kirjoitti:
> ke, 2011-01-19 kello 10:18 +, Stuart Morris kirjoitti:
> > My experience with an nVidia GT220 has been less than perfect. It can
> > perform temporal+spatial+inverse_telecine on HD video fast eno
On 2011-01-22 08:16 +0100, Thomas Hilber wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:42:40PM +, Stuart Morris wrote:
> > conversion and then draw the first field to the frame buffer. At the next
> > vertical sync the shader would convert the second field and draw that to
> > the frame buffer. With VDPA
On 2011-02-01 19:48 +0100, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
> And the reason why I hadn't tried those:
>
> vdr-sxfe: option '--hud' doesn't allow an argument
> vdr-sxfe: unrecognized option '--opengl'
Then you have an old version of Xineliboutput. What does vdr-sxfe -h say
about the options? For example, I
20 matches
Mail list logo
