[vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device

2009-03-16 Thread Heinrich Langos
Hi, I just installed vdr 1.6.0 on Debian stable (Lenny). I run it on an old notebook (Dell 1300, 1.5 GHz Celeron M). Up until now the system was a network storage for some windows clients and a music player for my living room. Now I plan to use vdr as a remote controled VCR. To keep it quiet

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device

2009-03-16 Thread Heinrich Langos
Just to complete the picture, here's the powertop output while recording. Don't start cheering about less wakeups per second (1300 vs 2700). There's less wakups per second as the system doesn't get into idle mode as often, in the first place. -henrik PowerTOP version 1.10 (C) 2007 In

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device

2009-03-16 Thread Heinrich Langos
Hei Antti, On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:19:30PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: > Heinrich Langos wrote: >> That is with dvb_usb_af9015 loaded but with "remote=0" module parameter >> to disable the remote control input that aparently is done by polling. > > remote=0

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device

2009-03-16 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:07:21PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:19:30PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: > > > > remote=0 does not disable polling, it is for selecting correct remote. > > Well, setting remote=0 does have an effect (af9015.c): &g

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device

2009-03-16 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 05:23:53PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: > Heinrich Langos wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:07:21PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:19:30PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: >>>> remote=0 does not disable pollin

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device

2009-03-18 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 05:23:53PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: > Heinrich Langos wrote: >> >> Anyway .. the main problem remains. >> >> Is there a tool that would only do some minimal actions on a dvb >> device? > > Like power_on? femon for example

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device, vp7045, and various plugins

2009-03-22 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:40:38PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: > Heinrich Langos wrote: >> I ran "dvbtraffic" (itself causing about 10 wakups but hardly any cpu load) >> on another console to see what is happening and it seems like "femon" >> does on

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device, vp7045, and various plugins

2009-03-22 Thread Heinrich Langos
Here's the powertop output for the siemens stick in various situations: cheers -henrik running zap to tune into a channel and transfer the TS over USB PowerTOP version 1.10 (C) 2007 Intel Corporation

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device, vp7045, and various plugins

2009-03-22 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 06:16:29PM +0100, Martin Emrich wrote: > Heinrich Langos schrieb: > > > > I ran a couple of tests with a different DVB-T USB stick. The rather old > > "Fujitsu-Siemens DVB-T Mobile TV". That one turns out to need a lot less > > system r

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device, vp7045, and various plugins

2009-03-23 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:18:56AM +0100, Martin Emrich wrote: > > Heinrich Langos schrieb: > > > I am pretty sure the Siemens stick doesn't filter PIDs. The easy way to > > find out about that is to look at > > http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/DVB-T_USB_Dev

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device, vp7045, and various plugins

2009-03-23 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 01:43:50PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: > moi! > > Martin Emrich wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Antti Palosaari schrieb: > > > >> All AF9015 devices supports PID-filtering by HW. And both Windows and > >> Linux driver supports also. > > > > Interesting. How do I enable the HW

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device, vp7045, and various plugins

2009-03-23 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 05:02:54PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: > Heinrich Langos wrote: >> How about a module option to force usage of the PID filter? >> Should be easy to add if the code for enabling it on demand is aready >> there. > > It is there. > modinfo

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device, vp7045, and various plugins

2009-03-23 Thread Heinrich Langos
For completeness and comparability: The Fujitsu Stick (vp7045) still by far beats the af9015 in terms of resource usage with vdr. (13% vs 19% with or 37% without hw pid filter) It doesn't seem to hava a hw pid filter ( at least it doesn't react to the force_pid_filter_usage option. so here ar

Re: [vdr] VDR-Live plugin

2009-03-24 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:44:12AM +0100, Rob Davis wrote: > How do you use this from the internet? I have got it working (via > Gentoo) on my lan, but I wan't to use it with the extern function of > streamdev using my dynamic dns name. I have opened the port but it > keeps asking for the user

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device, vp7045, and various plugins

2009-03-24 Thread Heinrich Langos
Moikka Antti, > vp7045 does not have PID-filters. > I think difference comes from different USB-transfer settings. vp7045 > uses BULK packet size 4096 and af9015 uses BULK packet size 512 for > USB2.0 and BULK packet size 64 for USB1.1. Therefore af9015 sends 8 > times more packets than vp70

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device, vp7045, and various plugins

2009-03-27 Thread Heinrich Langos
Hi Antti, On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:48:01PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: > Antti Palosaari wrote: >> Heinrich Langos wrote: >>> Moikka Antti, >>> >>>> vp7045 does not have PID-filters. >>>> I think difference comes from different USB-transfer

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device, vp7045, and various plugins

2009-03-27 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:57:14PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: > Heinrich Langos wrote: >> BTW: I got myself a "Toshiba USB DVB-T Tuner PX1211E-1TVD" based on the >> DiB3000M-C/P. Unlike the siemens stick it has a pid filter. I only >> tested it without the

Re: [vdr] power consumption, powertop and wakups per second with a af9015 device, vp7045, and various plugins

2009-03-30 Thread Heinrich Langos
Hi Antti, Just to complete this I've made some tests with the "Toshiba USB DVB-T Tuner PX1211E-1TVD". The short result is: Without PID filter its load is equivalent to the Fujitsu-Siemens. (5.8% and 14.4%) With PID filter it produces even less load than the af9015 with pid filter. About 0.5% wit