Am 05.02.2015 um 20:55 schrieb VDR User:
> "adaptive skipping"
The action is skipping, the achievement is searching.
So we do
"Binary Search"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_search_algorithm
or
"Binäre Suche"
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin%C3%A4re_Suche
Ok, this may be considered infor
On 2/5/2015 8:55 PM, VDR User wrote:
The question now is: is "bisect" the right word here, which a native English
speaker would use? Or should it rather be "halve"? Or something completely
different?
Bisect isn't correct. Bisecting means to cut something into 2 parts.
Using "halve" doesn't make
>> "adaptive skipping"
>
> The action is skipping, the achievement is searching.
>
> So we do
>
> "Binary Search"
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_search_algorithm
Searching isn't an achievement (or whatever you mean), it's part of
the skipping process. You `search` (aka look for) the timesta
Thanks for all the helpful responses.
The final verdict is:
Initial duration for adaptive skipping (s) = 120
Defines the number of seconds to jump from the current
replay
position in either direction, when pressing the '1' or
'3'
Hi Klaus,
yes, very good ... :)
===
Kind regards
Frank
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] Im Auftrag von
Klaus Schmidinger
Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Februar 2015 18:22
An: vdr@linuxtv.org
Betreff: Re: [vdr] Advice from native speakers need
