>>
>am not sure if softcam is a legal topic on this list, but I would
>advise you to take a look at the dvbapi plugin instead of sc. I am not
>sure if it will fix your problem, though - but it is a way more stable
>and better solution in my opinion.
>
>I had to go softcam to support Conax as well
On 02.12.2013 20:31, Lou wrote:
Am 02.12.2013, 17:59 Uhr, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger :
I guess this was caused by the changes to videodir.[ch].
For a quick fix you could try moving the line
cVideoDirectory::SetName(VideoDirectory);
into the
case 'v': VideoDirectory = optarg;
On 16.12.2013 18:11, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
Hi all,
I am not sure if this was reported already, but I encountered this bug when
trying to edit a recording without setting up VDR:
./vdr -v /tmp/video --edit /tmp/video/Rec_name/2013-08-12.20.58.50.99.rec
Without the attached patch, VDR would try t
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:35:19PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
I think I'll do it this way:
Thanks, this looks OK too. I guess that your patch is against the
development branch. In 2.0.4, the function is SetVideoDirectory()
instead of cVideoDirectory::SetName().
Marko
_
On 25.12.2013 15:03, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:35:19PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
I think I'll do it this way:
Thanks, this looks OK too. I guess that your patch is against the development
branch. In 2.0.4, the function is SetVideoDirectory() instead of
cVideoDirect
After upgrading to VDR 2.0, I got Softdevice to almost work (see the
mail archive a couple of months ago). Sometimes it is showing garbage
(really random noise) on the MGA350 OSD layer; I can live with that, as
this box is only used for infrequent recordings.
The last annoying problem is that
On 12/24/2013 05:30 PM, cedric.dew...@telfort.nl wrote:
> Hi All,
Hello!
> When I stream an encrypted channel into my browser, I see the following
> errors in /var/log/oscam/oscam.log
>
> 2013/12/24 16:14:39 14F4DA8 c ERROR: Can't open device /dev/dvb/adapter0/ca0
> (errno=2 No such file or di
If you haven't done so already, please bring this to Johns (author of
softhddevice) at the vdrportal forum.
Thanks
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
> After upgrading to VDR 2.0, I got Softdevice to almost work (see the mail
> archive a couple of months ago). Sometimes it is
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:23:23PM -0800, VDR User wrote:
If you haven't done so already, please bring this to Johns (author of
softhddevice) at the vdrportal forum.
I did not yet, because softdevice has little to do with softhddevice.
But thanks for the hint, I think I should set up vdr, sof
Oops! I misread softdevice as softhddevice. Sorry for the confusion there.
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:23:23PM -0800, VDR User wrote:
>>
>> If you haven't done so already, please bring this to Johns (author of
>> softhddevice) at the vdrportal
10 matches
Mail list logo