Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Gero
On Saturday 07 April 2012 - 08:43:40, VDR User wrote: > I don't spread things all over my house ... > All my bathroom items are in the bathroom. > All my kitchen items are in my kitchen. > All my office items are in my office. But you use all that items on different tasks in different places. I

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Stefan Taferner
Am 2012-04-07 04:05, schrieb VDR User: On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Gero wrote: Well, *I* think, that there's a big difference between keeping things in order compared to spreading things all over the place. I can't stand when things are installed all over the place. It's too messy and poi

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
[ ... arguments about pros and cons of FHS ... ] The purpose of this thread is not to discuss the pros and cons of the FHS vs. having all files of an application in one place. Clearly these two approaches are so fundamentally different that there will never be a common ground. And any comparison

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.27

2012-04-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 06.04.2012 22:13, Juergen Lock wrote: In article<4f6f0570.7050...@tvdr.de> you write: VDR developer version 1.7.27 is now available at ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.27.tar.bz2 A 'diff' against the previous version is available at ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Udo Richter
Am 06.04.2012 15:01, schrieb Christopher Reimer: > could someone please review the attached patch? It's originally posted > by Maniac in this thread --> On the original topic, I see room for one improvement: The defaults of the new --cachedir and --resdir parameter are the defaults set by Make.co

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Christopher Reimer
2012/4/7 Udo Richter > Am 06.04.2012 15:01, schrieb Christopher Reimer: > > could someone please review the attached patch? It's originally posted > > by Maniac in this thread --> > > On the original topic, I see room for one improvement: > > I tried to fix this on my own. So be careful In case

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.27

2012-04-07 Thread Juergen Lock
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 06.04.2012 22:13, Juergen Lock wrote: > > In article<4f6f0570.7050...@tvdr.de> you write: > >> VDR developer version 1.7.27 is now available at > >> > >>ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.27.tar.bz2 > >> > >> A 'd

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Anssi Hannula
> FHS patch This change would be welcome (I'm the VDR package maintainer of Mageia distribution), though it hasn't really been a big issue for me. A couple of comments regarding the INSTALL part: 06.04.2012 16:01, Christopher Reimer kirjoitti: > +CACHEDIR = /var/cache/vdr > +CONFDIR = /var/lib/

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 19:24:17 +0300 Anssi Hannula wrote: > > FHS patch > > This change would be welcome (I'm the VDR package maintainer of Mageia > distribution), though it hasn't really been a big issue for me. > > A couple of comments regarding the INSTALL part: > > 06.04.2012 16:01, Christop

Re: [vdr] Filesystem hierachy standard patch needs review.

2012-04-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 07.04.2012 20:03, Steffen Barszus wrote: ... +VIDEODIR = /srv/vdr/video0 ... video0 , because it allows for easy extension of storage space, without reconfiguring vdr, video1, video2 and videoX will be used autmatically by vdr at next start. Note, though, that after version 2.0 this "mu