Re: [vdr] LiveBuffer for vdr 1.7.x

2011-12-21 Thread René
On 21.12.2011 24:12 , Lists wrote: I'm stuck to vdr 1.6.0-2 because i can't find a current LiveBuffer patch for any current vdr 1.7.x. Does anyone know if there is any work going on with this great patch? Here you go. I grabbed this from the yaVDR source. Norm Hi Norm, Thanks!! Do you kno

Re: [vdr] LiveBuffer for vdr 1.7.x

2011-12-21 Thread Norm Dressler
On 12/21/2011 3:48 AM, René wrote: On 21.12.2011 24:12 , Lists wrote: I'm stuck to vdr 1.6.0-2 because i can't find a current LiveBuffer patch for any current vdr 1.7.x. Does anyone know if there is any work going on with this great patch? Here you go. I grabbed this from the yaVDR source.

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] vdr-1.7.21 & DVB-T2 support

2011-12-21 Thread Rolf Ahrenberg
No comments? Am I really the only one running such a DVB-T + DVB-T2 system? Anyway, this has worked quite nicely for a rather long time on my setup, and therefore I strongly suggest the integration of the patch into the official VDR tree before the next stable release. BR, -- rofa _

[vdr] vdr 1.7 in Fedora Rawhide

2011-12-21 Thread Pim Zandbergen
VDR 1.7.22 is in Fedora Rawhide, which means vdr 1.7.X should become available in Fedora 17 due in May 2012. Thanks to Ville Skyttä for maintaining the RPM's. For those who can't wait, the rawhide binary RPM's install en work just fine in Fedora 16, though I rebuilt them from source rpm to be sur

Re: [vdr] vdr 1.7 in Fedora Rawhide

2011-12-21 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 2011-12-21 17:36, Pim Zandbergen wrote: > VDR 1.7.22 is in Fedora Rawhide, which means vdr 1.7.X should > become available in Fedora 17 due in May 2012. Hopefully it'll be 1.8.x or 2.x by then ;) > For those who > can't wait, the rawhide binary RPM's install en work just fine > in Fedora 16, t

[vdr] Rotor / Rotor-NG not working with latest VDR

2011-12-21 Thread jan med
I think the problem is YaVDR. Rotorng work whit both vdr-1.7.21/22 (whit patch). There are only same problem with low/no signal! The old-rotor not compile for me. kind regards, Jan23 diff -ruN 1.7.22//device.h 1.7.22a//device.h --- 1.7.22//device.h 2011-12-04 14:38:17.0 +0100 +++ 1.7.22a/

Re: [vdr] LiveBuffer for vdr 1.7.x

2011-12-21 Thread René
On 21.12.2011 13:34 , Norm Dressler wrote: On 12/21/2011 3:48 AM, René wrote: On 21.12.2011 24:12 , Lists wrote: I'm stuck to vdr 1.6.0-2 because i can't find a current LiveBuffer patch for any current vdr 1.7.x. Does anyone know if there is any work going on with this great patch? Here you

Re: [vdr] Rotor / Rotor-NG not working with latest VDR

2011-12-21 Thread Lars Hanisch
Hi, Am 21.12.2011 22:12, schrieb jan med: I think the problem is YaVDR. Rotorng work whit both vdr-1.7.21/22 (whit patch). There are only same problem with low/no signal! The old-rotor not compile for me. That may be. Have you installed the latest updates? # sudo apt-get update # sudo apt-get

[vdr] [PATCH] vdr/config.c: memset has wrong parameters

2011-12-21 Thread Lars Hanisch
Hi, The compiler gives me: :~/src/vdr$ make config.o g++ -g -O3 -Wall -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-parentheses -c -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DREMOTE_KBD -DLIRC_DEVICE=\"/var/run/lirc/lircd\" -DRCU_DEVICE=\"/dev/ttyS1\" -D_GNU_SOURCE -DVIDEODIR=\"/video\" -D

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] vdr/config.c: memset has wrong parameters

2011-12-21 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 21.12.2011 23:18, Lars Hanisch wrote: Hi, The compiler gives me: :~/src/vdr$ make config.o g++ -g -O3 -Wall -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-parentheses -c -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DREMOTE_KBD -DLIRC_DEVICE=\"/var/run/lirc/lircd\" -DRCU_DEVICE=\"/dev/ttyS1\

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] vdr/config.c: memset has wrong parameters

2011-12-21 Thread Lars Hanisch
Am 21.12.2011 23:31, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger: On 21.12.2011 23:18, Lars Hanisch wrote: Hi, The compiler gives me: :~/src/vdr$ make config.o g++ -g -O3 -Wall -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-parentheses -c -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DREMOTE_KBD -DLIRC_DEVICE=\