Re: [vdr] VDR and Hybrid DVB Cards ( was "HVR 4000 drivers broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy" in linux-media list )

2011-11-15 Thread Hawes, Mark
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:08:24 +1100 "Hawes, Mark" wrote: >> Lars, >> >> Thanks for the reply. >> >> Output of ls -la /dev/dvb/adapter0: >> >> root@Nutrigrain:/home/digitalTV/vdr-1.7.21# ls -la /dev/dvb/adapter0/* >> crw-rw 1 root video 212, 1 Nov 14 19:20 /dev/dvb/adapter0/demux0 >> crw-rw

Re: [vdr] VDR and Hybrid DVB Cards ( was "HVR 4000 drivers broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy" in linux-media list )

2011-11-15 Thread Steffen Barszus
2011/11/15 Hawes, Mark : >>What i got from previous discussions on linux-media is, that if the >> device nodes are created within one adapter, an application needs to >> assume that >> the devices can not be used concurrently and needs to close >> one "device node group" before opening the other on

[vdr] vdr-xine-plugin and LATM AAC

2011-11-15 Thread Luis Fernandes
hello, is there a patch for vdr-xine-plugin to do the repack LATM AAC audio as e-ac3 patch. xine-lib-1.2 already supports and works very well in my recordings with LATM HE-AAC but not live tv. how can I do a debug, has changed on vdr172remux.c / / Set this to 'true' for debug output: DebugPatPm

Re: [vdr] VDR and Hybrid DVB Cards ( was "HVR 4000 drivers broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy" in linux-media list )

2011-11-15 Thread ian_and_joa...@talktalk.net
Hi, I am an HVR4000 owner too. Re: VDR internals I'm no expert but the basic assumption is that all devices are available at all time. This assumption has implications for e.g. timers, epg scans, multi-clients etc. This assumption breaks with the HVR4000. Basic use to watch one channel at a

Re: [vdr] VDR and Hybrid DVB Cards ( was "HVR 4000 drivers broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy" in linux-media list )

2011-11-15 Thread VDR User
This is starting to sound like a big overhaul. If that's the case, maybe it should go one step further and compartmentalize all the settings so VDR can take the next step and provide a true server/client option. ;) ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org h

Re: [vdr] VDR and Hybrid DVB Cards ( was "HVR 4000 drivers broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy" in linux-media list )

2011-11-15 Thread L. Hanisch
Am 15.11.2011 11:52, schrieb Steffen Barszus: 2011/11/15 Hawes, Mark: What i got from previous discussions on linux-media is, that if the device nodes are created within one adapter, an application needs to assume that the devices can not be used concurrently and needs to close one "device node

Re: [vdr] VDR and Hybrid DVB Cards ( was "HVR 4000 drivers broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy" in linux-media list )

2011-11-15 Thread Hawes, Mark
-Original Message- From: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] On Behalf Of L. Hanisch Sent: Wednesday, 16 November 2011 5:51 AM To: vdr@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [vdr] VDR and Hybrid DVB Cards ( was "HVR 4000 drivers broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy" in linux-media list )

Re: [vdr] VDR and Hybrid DVB Cards ( was "HVR 4000 drivers broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy" in linux-media list )

2011-11-15 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 15.11.2011, at 23:29, "Hawes, Mark" wrote: > -Original Message- > From: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] On Behalf > Of L. Hanisch > Sent: Wednesday, 16 November 2011 5:51 AM > To: vdr@linuxtv.org > Subject: Re: [vdr] VDR and Hybrid DVB Cards ( was "HVR 4000 dri

Re: [vdr] VDR and Hybrid DVB Cards ( was "HVR 4000 drivers broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy" in linux-media list )

2011-11-15 Thread Manu Abraham
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > > That is also my understanding of multi frontend devices. > If an "adapter" has several "frontends" only one of them can > be active at any given time. This has nothing to do with > any "explosives" (excuse the pun ;-) and will be implem