On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, VDR User wrote:
Ignoring remotes that don't follow the RGYB scheme doesn't make them
any less 'tv oriented' or go away. I can't imagine it's much of a
leap to make the colored button position customizable and is probably
something that's better to have then not. What good a
On 02.04.2011 11:33, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, VDR User wrote:
Ignoring remotes that don't follow the RGYB scheme doesn't make them
any less 'tv oriented' or go away. I can't imagine it's much of a
leap to make the colored button position customizable and is probably
something t
> Regardless, users always have the option to patch the feature in if it
> doesn't become a part of VDR's core.
Here we go! Provide a patch, users can use or not w/o assuming to change
vdr-core.
Like the majority of users, I do use remotes following kls's VDR standard
defined a century ago. I
Am 02.04.2011 12:23, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
> I could imagine accepting a patch that centralizes handling
> the sequence in which the color buttons are displayed, and
> offers a standard interface to skin plugins that allows
> them to arrange the color buttons accordingly.
>
> What I don't wan
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 12:33:58 +0300 (EEST)
Rolf Ahrenberg wrote:
> The RGYB color enumeration is defined in the video teletext standard and
> every TV/STB set implementing the teletext feature DOES use the
> mentioned color button order. I guess the teletext is used mainly in
> Europe, so there
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:40 AM, fnu wrote:
>> Regardless, users always have the option to patch the feature in if it
>> doesn't become a part of VDR's core.
>
> Here we go! Provide a patch, users can use or not w/o assuming to change
> vdr-core.
>
> Like the majority of users, I do use remotes f
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote:
> The RGYB color enumeration is defined in the video teletext standard and
> every TV/STB set implementing the teletext feature DOES use the mentioned
> color button order. I guess the teletext is used mainly in Europe, so there
> might be diff
On 02.04.2011 02:38, Joerg Riechardt wrote:
Problem solved with this patch:
--- dvbplayer.c.orig 2010-03-07 15:24:26.0 +0100
+++ dvbplayer.c 2011-04-02 01:57:21.016535946 +0200
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@
if (nonBlockingFileReader)
nonBlockingFileReader->Clear();
if (!firstPacket) // don't set th
Am 02.04.2011 23:18, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
On 02.04.2011 02:38, Joerg Riechardt wrote:
Problem solved with this patch:
--- dvbplayer.c.orig 2010-03-07 15:24:26.0 +0100
+++ dvbplayer.c 2011-04-02 01:57:21.016535946 +0200
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@
if (nonBlockingFileReader)
nonBlockingFileR
Hi!
Does the bitstreamout plugin still make sense for VDR 1.7.17?
Upstream has been dead for about 3 years now and I'm considering
to remove this plugin from the Debian archive.
bye,
Tobias
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/
10 matches
Mail list logo