Hi,
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:15:44 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
> The problem is that the VPS code in vdr.c avoids devices that are
> currently recording. And since this is a rather complex area,
> I'm not sure if it's too good an idea to change this ;-)
>
> If you feel like it, you may want to t
On 03/07/11 13:23, Frank Schmirler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:15:44 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
>> The problem is that the VPS code in vdr.c avoids devices that are
>> currently recording. And since this is a rather complex area,
>> I'm not sure if it's too good an idea to change t
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:33:47 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
> On 03/07/11 13:23, Frank Schmirler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:15:44 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
> >> The problem is that the VPS code in vdr.c avoids devices that are
> >> currently recording. And since this is a r
On 03/07/11 14:13, Frank Schmirler wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:33:47 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
>> On 03/07/11 13:23, Frank Schmirler wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:15:44 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
The problem is that the VPS code in vdr.c avoids devices that are
>>>
2011/3/7 Klaus Schmidinger :
> On 03/07/11 14:13, Frank Schmirler wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:33:47 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
>>> On 03/07/11 13:23, Frank Schmirler wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:15:44 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
> The problem is that the VPS code
2011/3/7 Steffen Barszus :
> 2011/3/7 Klaus Schmidinger :
>> On 03/07/11 14:13, Frank Schmirler wrote:
>>> On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:33:47 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
On 03/07/11 13:23, Frank Schmirler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:15:44 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
>>>