Re: [vdr] Request for rotor/actuator support integration to vdr

2011-01-22 Thread YUP
Hi, What about actuator plugin from Luca http://ventoso.org/luca/vdr/ (wiki page in German is here http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/Actuator-plugin , use google translate to translate)? Yarema 2011/1/22 Timothy D. Lenz > Time to bump this request again > > ___

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] naludump 0.0.1

2011-01-22 Thread Rolf Ahrenberg
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Udo Richter wrote: On 01.01.2011 22:29, Udo Richter wrote: Later versions will also integrate into VDR as a patch, and will filter out these fillers while recording. I had some issues integrating it properly into the recording function of VDR, and then ran out of time. Bu

Re: [vdr] [patch] pin & epgsearch plugins compatibility

2011-01-22 Thread Helmut Auer
Hello I found that pin& epgsearch plugins are not compatible if it is compiled on 1.7.16 (maybe more versions). Patch for epgsearch-0.9.25.beta18 is in attachment This patch doesn't compile on my system. >menu_commands.c: In member function ‘virtual eOSState cMenuSearchCommands::Record()’:

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] naludump 0.0.1

2011-01-22 Thread Udo Richter
Am 22.01.2011 14:18, schrieb Rolf Ahrenberg: > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Udo Richter wrote: >> I had some issues integrating it properly into the recording function of >> VDR, and then ran out of time. But I think I'll find some time this >> weekend. > > Howabout just adding a filter API and do the act

Re: [vdr] Deinterlace video (was: Replacing aging VDR for DVB-S2)

2011-01-22 Thread Niko Mikkilä
On 2011-01-22 08:16 +0100, Thomas Hilber wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:42:40PM +, Stuart Morris wrote: > > conversion and then draw the first field to the frame buffer. At the next > > vertical sync the shader would convert the second field and draw that to > > the frame buffer. With VDPA

Re: [vdr] Request for rotor/actuator support integration to vdr

2011-01-22 Thread Timothy D. Lenz
I know about that plugin. Won't really help with a rotor. Different setup. Actuators are for BUD's, Dishes over 1.2m though they have come out with small dish systems. Normally A small dish rotro uses DiSEqC sent up the cable to control the motor. The rotor plugin is for that, but current versi

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] naludump 0.0.1

2011-01-22 Thread Timothy D. Lenz
Has anyone here every used or seen an STB's rotor support? The one I have is a first gen Neusat SP-6000. Maybe those of you with the interest in doing it and programing skill to tackle it have a sat store near by where you can see one and get a look at the setup functions. OR find a cheap one o

Re: [vdr] Request for rotor/actuator support integration to vdr

2011-01-22 Thread Luca Olivetti
Al 22/01/11 19:31, En/na Timothy D. Lenz ha escrit: I know about that plugin. Won't really help with a rotor. Different setup. Actuators are for BUD's, Dishes over 1.2m though they have come out with small dish systems. Yes, my dish is 1.2m, but I fitted it for an analog receiver, long before

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] naludump 0.0.1

2011-01-22 Thread Rolf Ahrenberg
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Udo Richter wrote: Thought of that too, for a longer perspective. However, what do you think where to add such a hook ideally? My original idea was to hook in cDevice::Action() as it would bring most flexible setup to blacklist/rewrite pids. However, I forgot the current

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] naludump 0.0.1

2011-01-22 Thread Rolf Ahrenberg
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Timothy D. Lenz wrote: Has anyone here every used or seen an STB's rotor support? The one I have is a first gen Neusat SP-6000. Maybe those of you with the interest in doing it and programing skill to tackle it have a sat store near by where you can see one and get a look

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] naludump 0.0.1

2011-01-22 Thread Udo Richter
Am 22.01.2011 20:21, schrieb Rolf Ahrenberg: >> And I wouldn't consider it good style to provide just filtered >> streams for all in any case. > > Wouldn't stripping NALU fill data help to reduce the required network > bandwidth for streamdev, xineliboutput, and vnsi plugins? I do see many > benef

Re: [vdr] Request for rotor/actuator support integration to vdr

2011-01-22 Thread VDR User
I could be wrong about this but it seems I remember this subject coming up some time ago and Klaus mentioning rotor support is on his todo list. My apologies if I've got that backwards. ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin

Re: [vdr] Request for rotor/actuator support integration to vdr

2011-01-22 Thread Timothy D. Lenz
That would be nice, I thought he said he wasn't interested in doing it because of lack of interest. I tried to get the subject going again because there are people who would want it, but it seems most of those that would use it are not programmers and rely on others to write it. There are also

Re: [vdr] Request for rotor/actuator support integration to vdr

2011-01-22 Thread VDR User
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Timothy D. Lenz wrote: > That would be nice, I thought he said he wasn't interested in doing it > because of lack of interest. I tried to get the subject going again because > there are people who would want it, but it seems most of those that would > use it are n