Re: [vdr] Replacing aging VDR for DVB-S2

2011-01-18 Thread Niko Mikkilä
On 2011-01-15 22:36 +, Tony Houghton wrote: > I wonder whether it might be possible to use a more eonomical card which > is only powerful enough to decode 1080i without deinterlacing it and > take advantage of the abundant CPU power most people have nowadays to > perform software deinterlacing

Re: [vdr] Replacing aging VDR for DVB-S2

2011-01-18 Thread Tony Houghton
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:06:50 +0200 Niko Mikkilä wrote: > On 2011-01-15 22:36 +, Tony Houghton wrote: > > > BTW, speaking of temporal and spatial deinterlacing: AFAICT one > > means combining fields to provide maximum resolution with half the > > frame rate of the interlaced fields, and the o

Re: [vdr] Replacing aging VDR for DVB-S2

2011-01-18 Thread Niko Mikkilä
On 2011-01-18 14:49 +, Tony Houghton wrote: > I still can't translate that explanation into simple mechanics. Is > temporal like weave and spatial like bob or the other way round? Or > something a little more sophisticated, interpolating parts of the > picture belonging to the "wrong" field fro

Re: [vdr] vdr segfaults with glibc 2.12.2

2011-01-18 Thread Scott Waye
Thanks a lot. I used: --enable-kernel=2.6.36 and it works fine now. -- Scott On 12/01/2011 00:11, David Spicer wrote: It turns out that the problem was known already. The fix is to rebuild Arch's x86_64 glibc 2.12.2 package with the --enable-kernel configure option set to one of the "Good