Re: [vdr] xine-lib and vaapi support

2010-11-08 Thread Theunis Potgieter
On 6 November 2010 14:14, Udo Richter wrote: > Am 03.11.2010 10:06, schrieb Theunis Potgieter: >> I'm considering to upgrade my current p3 system to a hdmi/optical >> SPDIF and enough expansion slots to fill in dvb-s devices. > >> The unkown factor for me is, should I >> consider a motherboard whe

[vdr] xine-lib and vaapi support

2010-11-08 Thread lucian orasanu
Hello, how about moving to mplayer instead of xine-lib, is not maintained very well any more? ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Re: [vdr] xine-lib and vaapi support

2010-11-08 Thread Theunis Potgieter
On 8 November 2010 13:59, lucian orasanu wrote: > Hello, > > how about moving to mplayer instead of xine-lib, is not maintained very well > any more? > > My personal experience with mplayer is that it lacks proper aspect ratio detection or guessing based on source that does not contain the correc

Re: [vdr] xine-lib and vaapi support

2010-11-08 Thread Niko Mikkilä
On 2010-11-08 at 12:54 +0200, Theunis Potgieter wrote: > On 6 November 2010 14:14, Udo Richter wrote: > > AMD also supports vaapi, but progress is very slow, and its still very > > buggy. Also, its limited to closed source drivers. > > Sounds similar to what nvidia went through. AMD's progress h

Re: [vdr] xine-lib and vaapi support

2010-11-08 Thread Tony Houghton
On 08/11/10 12:50, Theunis Potgieter wrote: On 8 November 2010 13:59, lucian orasanu wrote: how about moving to mplayer instead of xine-lib, is not maintained very well any more? My personal experience with mplayer is that it lacks proper aspect ratio detection or guessing based on source th

Re: [vdr] Recordings Numbering

2010-11-08 Thread Olaf Titz
> But even with such unique numbers, an SVDRP client that accesses > recordings or timers would still need to know whether the VDR instance > it is communicating with has been restarted since the last time it > fetched the list of timers/recordings. It should keep the SVDRP connection open, then i

Re: [vdr] Recordings Numbering

2010-11-08 Thread Olaf Titz
> should start at 1 and count up as it already does. Also, instead of > changing the current numbering system, could using a hash provide you > with the same result you're looking for? I would think hashing the > first X MB of a recording would suffice to create a unique identifier. If you want