Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars"

2010-04-26 Thread Martin Dauskardt
> From: "Simon Baxter" > Subject: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars" > > Hi Everyone > > My machine has (among others) a PVR-500 dual-channel analog card and I'm > running vdr-1.6.0 with pvrinput-2008-07-05. you should upgrade to our new pvrinput version: http://projects.vdr-develope

[vdr] linux usb dvb-s card...

2010-04-26 Thread martinez
Hi, Anybody could recommand a usb dvb-s card (or dvb-s2 but it is not a must) fully linux compatible (so that it works with vdr 1.7.x) Cheers, Art ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[vdr] xineliboutput UDP detach from stream

2010-04-26 Thread Harald Overas
I have have witness the same behavior with screen blinking with xineliboutput (vdr-sxfe as remote client while connecting with TCP transport to the vdr-server) when changing the channels. I often get screen blinking when I change the channels to fast with my MCE remote (using the MCE remote arrows

[vdr] any gui to make life easier with channels.conf ?

2010-04-26 Thread Harald Overas
I use XXV to edit the channels.conf. It gives you a very good GUI in your web browser, and you can easy edit and sort these fields in channels.conf: Position Name Transponder frequency Signal source Various parameters, depending on signal source Symbol rate Video PID (VPID

Re: [vdr] linux usb dvb-s card...

2010-04-26 Thread Harald Overas
Linux DVB wiki has lot of information about Usb dvb-s cards working partly and fully under Linux: http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/DVB-S2_USB_Devices http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/DVB-S_USB_Devices Bye Harald On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:35 AM, martinez wrote: > Hi, > Anybody could rec

Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars"

2010-04-26 Thread Simon Baxter
you should upgrade to our new pvrinput version: http://projects.vdr-developer.org/attachments/download/288/vdr- pvrinput-2010-04-14.tgz see http://projects.vdr-developer.org/repositories/entry/plg-pvrinput/HISTORY I am pretty sure that your TV station broadcasts analogue TV not anamorphic, wh

[vdr] wirblescan 0.0.5-pre11e compilation errors

2010-04-26 Thread YUP
Hello, Did anybody try to compile latest wirblescan plugin for vdr 1.7.14? I mean version 0.0.5-pre11e. I've got these errors: scanner.c: In member function ‘virtual void cScanner::Action()’: scanner.c:679:25: error: expected type-specifier scanner.c:679:25: error: cannot convert ‘int*’ to ‘cSwRe

Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars"

2010-04-26 Thread VDR User
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Martin Dauskardt wrote: >> Doesn't matter which aspect ratio I choose, every channel under the PVR-500 >> displays with black (cinema) bars on the top and bottom of the image. > > I am pretty sure that your TV station broadcasts analogue TV not anamorphic, > which

Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars"

2010-04-26 Thread Tony Houghton
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:27:18 -0700 VDR User wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Martin Dauskardt > wrote: > > The driver does not support clipping/cropping. We will always encode > > the whole capture size. If there is already a bar, it will also be > > in the encoded stream. You could tr

Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars"

2010-04-26 Thread Timothy D. Lenz
My local stations here in the US are doing the reverse on all primary atsc channels. They add bars to the side for anything that is not wide screen to make it wide screen. So 4:3 stuff on my 4:3 tv are in a little window because the software then adds bars top and bottom to put it back to 4:3 :

Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars"

2010-04-26 Thread Martin Dauskardt
> From: VDR User > Subject: Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars" > > I am pretty sure that your TV station broadcasts analogue TV not > > anamorphic, which means it "delivers" the black bars to prevent the > > aspect ?ratio of a 16:9 content. > > The 'black bars' are called letterbo

Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars"

2010-04-26 Thread VDR User
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Martin Dauskardt wrote: > The mpeg is not delivered by the broadcaster, it is generated by the encoder. > The content of the header is a result of the V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_ASPECT > setting done by the application. If the aspect ratio flag is unreliable, again, you

Re: [vdr] vdr Digest, Vol 63, Issue 32

2010-04-26 Thread Martin Dauskardt
> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 07:03:50 +1200 > From: "Simon Baxter" > Subject: Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars" > > Found the original hack (attached). It will take time to have a look at your code. Just to let you know: The current pvrinput source allows to execute a script on e

Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars"

2010-04-26 Thread Rob Davis
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Martin Dauskardt wrote: >> The mpeg is not delivered by the broadcaster, it is generated by the >> encoder. >> The content of the header is a result of the V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_ASPECT >> setting done by the application. > > If the aspect ratio flag is unreliable,

Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars"

2010-04-26 Thread VDR User
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Rob Davis wrote: > Except this is an input device, not an output device.  It converts an > analogue signal to mpeg2, as such, it needs to make guesses about what > it's going to find.. Ahh, analog source & encoding. There won't be any mpeg headers and so on from

Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars"

2010-04-26 Thread Simon Baxter
You _could_ write some functions to detect and remove letterboxing, though I don't know anyone motivated enough to actually do it. The main goal of the pvrinput-plugin is to use the hardware encoder.I think it is a bad idea to do software-based on-the-fly-recoding. Simon, which output device

Re: [vdr] PVRINPUT plugin and "black/cinema bars"

2010-04-26 Thread Simon Baxter
If you want to limit the plugin to using only the hardware then I agree. However, if you want to provide capabilities beyond what the hardware is capable of then software is the only other place to do it. This is perfectly fine, although it probably means the user wasted his money on a hardware d