Re: [vdr] Adapt Make.config.template to VDR 1.7.13

2010-03-30 Thread Joachim Wilke
On 03/28/2010 02:49 PM, Paul Menzel wrote: > Frank pointed the following out back then [1]. > Am Freitag, den 29.01.2010, 10:04 +0100 schrieb Frank Schmirler: > >> 3) in Make.config.template, remove only the line >> DEFINES += -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE >> T

Re: [vdr] Adapt Make.config.template to VDR 1.7.13

2010-03-30 Thread Joachim Wilke
On 03/28/2010 02:49 PM, Paul Menzel wrote: > Frank pointed the following out back then [1]. > Am Freitag, den 29.01.2010, 10:04 +0100 schrieb Frank Schmirler: > >> 3) in Make.config.template, remove only the line >> DEFINES += -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE >> T

Re: [vdr] xine-lib patch

2010-03-30 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Am 29.03.2010 13:35, schrieb elimodel: > reinhard, why don't you incude this new patch in the xine plugin source > code? , why don't you release a new version with the new patch in the > plugin? I'm just a little bit short on spare time, but I'm trying to release soon ... Bye. -- Dipl.-Inf

[vdr] Using different types of device for the same channel

2010-03-30 Thread Rob Davis
I don't know if I immagined it, but is there a way to get VDR to use a secondary channel if the first channel is busy? To give an explanation, I have multiple ways a I can receive a channel, through ATSC, or through PVRINPUT or NTSC. I would like to know if there is a rollover system, if the firs

Re: [vdr] Using different types of device for the same channel

2010-03-30 Thread Theunis Potgieter
On 30 March 2010 21:26, Rob Davis wrote: > > I don't know if I immagined it, but is there a way to get VDR to use a > secondary channel if the first channel is busy? > > To give an explanation, I have multiple ways a I can receive a channel, > through ATSC, or through PVRINPUT or NTSC.  I would li

Re: [vdr] Using different types of device for the same channel

2010-03-30 Thread Matti Lehtimäki
Theunis Potgieter wrote: On 30 March 2010 21:26, Rob Davis wrote: I don't know if I immagined it, but is there a way to get VDR to use a secondary channel if the first channel is busy? To give an explanation, I have multiple ways a I can receive a channel, through ATSC, or through PVRINPUT or

Re: [vdr] Using different types of device for the same channel

2010-03-30 Thread Rob Davis
> On 30 March 2010 21:26, Rob Davis wrote: >> >> I don't know if I immagined it, but is there a way to get VDR to use a >> secondary channel if the first channel is busy? >> >> To give an explanation, I have multiple ways a I can receive a channel, >> through ATSC, or through PVRINPUT or NTSC.  I

Re: [vdr] Using different types of device for the same channel

2010-03-30 Thread Rob Davis
> Theunis Potgieter wrote: > It could be possible to do it in a similar way as Alternative channel > -patch (http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/Alternative_channel-patch) > handles alternative channels. But since that patch only works for > recording a channel it would need some work. Does th

Re: [vdr] Using different types of device for the same channel

2010-03-30 Thread L. Hanisch
Hi Rob, Am 30.03.2010 22:30, schrieb Rob Davis: Theunis Potgieter wrote: It could be possible to do it in a similar way as Alternative channel -patch (http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/Alternative_channel-patch) handles alternative channels. But since that patch only works for recording a

Re: [vdr] Using different types of device for the same channel

2010-03-30 Thread Timothy D. Lenz
What plugin are you using for ntsc and how are you making the channels.conf for ntsc? I have an HVR-1800 and the wiki says it is supported , but I've heard elsewhere that it isn't. On 3/30/2010 12:26 PM, Rob Davis wrote: I don't know if I immagined it, but is there a way to get VDR to use a se

Re: [vdr] Using different types of device for the same channel

2010-03-30 Thread Rob Davis
On 30/03/10 17:23, Timothy D. Lenz wrote: > What plugin are you using for ntsc and how are you making the > channels.conf for ntsc? I have an HVR-1800 and the wiki says it is > supported , but I've heard elsewhere that it isn't. > I don't think it is, as it's a dual mode card, so VDR will assume