Re: [vdr] Problem with very large filesystem

2009-08-12 Thread Marco Göbenich
Hi! Some more log output Aug 12 10:10:40 rec-ism-1 vdr: [12960] ERROR: /video: Value too large for defined data type Aug 12 10:10:40 rec-ism-1 last message repeated 181 times Aug 12 10:10:40 rec-ism-1 vdr: [12960] ...no old recording found, giving up Aug 12 10:10:40 rec-ism-1 vdr: [12960] ERROR:

Re: [vdr] Problem with very large filesystem

2009-08-12 Thread Marco Göbenich
Hi! Seems that if (statfs(Directory, &statFs) == 0) returns false. I changed struct statfs64 statFs; if (statfs64(Directory, &statFs) == 0) { This works. Recordings are now stored. Is there a better fix for that. Regards Marco Marco Göbenich schrieb: > Hi! > > Some more log output > > Au

Re: [vdr] Problem with very large filesystem

2009-08-12 Thread Marco Göbenich
Hi! Tried to use DEFINES += -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE as added in vdr-1.7.4 make.config.template, but this causes other warnings/errors: recording.c: In constructor ‘cIndexFile::cIndexFile(const char*, bool)’: recording.c:1207: warning: format ‘%ld’ expects

Re: [vdr] Problem with very large filesystem

2009-08-12 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 12.08.2009 14:32, Marco Göbenich wrote: > Hi! > > Tried to use > > DEFINES += -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > as added in vdr-1.7.4 make.config.template, but this causes other > warnings/errors: > > recording.c: In constructor ‘cIndexFile::cIndexFile(const c

Re: [vdr] [Announce] xxv-1.3 - Feature release (1.4 rc)

2009-08-12 Thread Andreas Brachold
Hello, Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2009, 00:34 +0200 schrieb Diego Pierotto: > Anyway, after created the mo file i run Xxv but i can't see the > italian rows just translated. I set it_IT.UTF8 in xxvd file and it_IT > in xxv.cfg file without success. Please check follow things : * exits the file (rea

Re: [vdr] No audio with recordings, XBMC frontend, LATM AAC

2009-08-12 Thread Scott Waye
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 09:35 +1200, Alex Fazzari wrote: > Hi, > > I'm setting up VDR using xbmc as a frontend as described here: > http://xbmc.org/forum/showthread.php?t=45314&highlight=audio > > I've got live streaming working well but have an issue with recordings > where no audio comes through

Re: [vdr] BBC HD Problems

2009-08-12 Thread Morfsta
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Morfsta wrote: > Hi, > > There appears to have been some changes made recently to BBCHD on 28.2E: - > > BBCHD:BBC:10847:vC56M2O35S0:S28.2E:22000:2328:2330=NAR;2329=eng:2331:0:6940 > :2:2050:0 > > It is now not watchable with a reel eHD card - no audio and stutterin

Re: [vdr] BBC HD Problems

2009-08-12 Thread dplu
Hi They change few weeks ago, it works fine also with vdpau (test version=180.44) , even sound is OK (DD track was crispy) Now, it would be nice, they adapt also ITV HD to not loose PPID @+ Le Wednesday 12 August 2009 22:43:04 Morfsta, vous avez écrit : > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Morf

Re: [vdr] No audio with recordings, XBMC frontend, LATM AAC

2009-08-12 Thread Alex Fazzari
Hi Scott, Only that the file has no audio stream. Opening a recorded file in mplayer I the following: Playing /var/lib/video.00/Real_Life#3A_The_Great_Sperm_Race/2009-08-11.21.28.1-0.re c/1.ts. TS file format detected. VIDEO H264(pid=250) NO AUDIO! NO SUBS (yet)! PROGRAM N. 132 FPS seems to

Re: [vdr] No audio with recordings, XBMC frontend, LATM AAC

2009-08-12 Thread Alex Fazzari
I read in the mail I've pasted below that VDR did not support AAC. Is this still the case? If so, could this be why I'm not getting audio in my recordings? Does anybody know of any patches / tweaks / changes I could use to enable AAC in VDR. I don't understand why I get sound with live tv usin

Re: [vdr] No audio with recordings, XBMC frontend, LATM AAC

2009-08-12 Thread Christian Tramnitz
My guess would be that since streamdev gives the whole TS to xbmc you can hear audio as long as xbmc knows how to handle it. When doing recordings however the PID filtering of vdr will be used and may omit the (to vdr unknown) audio track. This is just a shot into the dark but you could verify t