On 05/03/09 10:06, marti...@embl.de wrote:
> Using VDR 1.7.6
>
> 1) On 7 East, there are hannels with two audio shown as TUR, and ORJ
> (Tur for Turkish and Orj for original language) Default audio is Tur and
in
the
> OSD settings it is not possible to give Orj a higher priority as it is no
t in
Quoting marti...@embl.de:
> Also one little thing that is driving me crazy.
> My 3 years old daughter presses accidentally the Pause button and starts al
> l
> sort of instant recordings silenty, my wife then complains vdr is broken
> because she can´t change channels.
>
> What I am asking for is
Rolf Ahrenberg a écrit :
> On Sun, 3 May 2009, Tomas Berglund wrote:
>
>> Do you mean aspect ratio 2.21:1 ?
>>
>> +const char *VideoAspectString[] = { "4:3",
>> +"16:9",
>> +"2.21:9"
>> + };
>
On Mon, 4 May 2009, Nicolas Huillard wrote:
> Rolf Ahrenberg a écrit :
>> On Sun, 3 May 2009, Tomas Berglund wrote:
>>
>>> Do you mean aspect ratio 2.21:1 ?
>>>
>>> +const char *VideoAspectString[] = { "4:3",
>>> +"16:9",
>>> +
On Mon, 4 May 2009, Falk Spitzberg wrote:
> The OSD should adopt to the size of the video material. If that is
> scaled to some non TV screen size, the OSD is scaled by the same factor.
I still disagree. If you scale down your OSD to video resolution (i.e.
544x576) and afterwards scale up the bo
and what about anamorphic material?
A 16:9 SD broadcast in fact still is 4:3 but is streached by the TV to
16:9 to look ok (no egg-heads).
Wouldn't it be correct also to draw the OSD anamorphic so that is not
screached by the TV?
Did you get the point? It's somehow difficult to describe this topi
Off-topic question:
Are there any (free) EDID binary data editors available that are able to
edit the CEA block
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EDID#Extension_Block_Details ?
I'd like to disable 1080i modes from my EDID via CustomEDID option to
avoid Nvidia drivers to use them as back-end resolut
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Falk Spitzberg wrote:
>
> The OSD should adopt to the size of the video material. If that is
> scaled to some non TV screen size, the OSD is scaled by the same factor.
>
Isn't that precisely what people would like to avoid? Since most of
the material being broadcas
Am Montag, den 04.05.2009, 14:13 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Huillard:
> Rolf Ahrenberg a écrit :
> > On Sun, 3 May 2009, Tomas Berglund wrote:
> >
> >> Do you mean aspect ratio 2.21:1 ?
> >>
> >> +const char *VideoAspectString[] = { "4:3",
> >> +"16:9",
> >> +
On 03.05.2009 23:09, Tomas Berglund wrote:
> Do you mean aspect ratio 2.21:1 ?
>
> +const char *VideoAspectString[] = { "4:3",
> +"16:9",
> +"2.21:9"
> + };
Yes, sorry, was a typo.
Reinhard Ni
On 04.05.2009 08:00, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2009, Tomas Berglund wrote:
>
>> Do you mean aspect ratio 2.21:1 ?
>>
>> +const char *VideoAspectString[] = { "4:3",
>> +"16:9",
>> +"2.21:9"
>> +
hi
the logo from xinelibout is distorted in the upper left corner.
so i make a patch witch is transparent and in korrect aspect
ratio.
see attached patch.
stefandiff -urNad vdr-plugin-xineliboutput-1.0.0~rc2~/vdrlogo_32x32.c vdr-plugin-xineliboutput-1.0.0~rc2/vdrlogo_32x32.c
--- vdr-plugin-xine
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Gerald Dachs wrote:
> Quoting marti...@embl.de:
>
>> Also one little thing that is driving me crazy.
>> My 3 years old daughter presses accidentally the Pause button and starts al
>> l
>> sort of instant recordings silenty, my wife then complains vdr is broken
>> be
Matthias Becker a écrit :
> and what about anamorphic material?
> A 16:9 SD broadcast in fact still is 4:3 but is streached by the TV to
> 16:9 to look ok (no egg-heads).
> Wouldn't it be correct also to draw the OSD anamorphic so that is not
> screached by the TV?
>
> Did you get the point? It's
I keep seeing mention of people using computer monitors and that VDR
should be designed to accommodate their aspect ratios. I'd like to
point out that plenty of users don't use VDR with a computer monitor
at all. Like many others, I have an hdtv (60" in my case) and would
love to have an osd that
Hello Joerg,
Am Sonntag, den 03.05.2009, 21:13 +0200 schrieb Joerg Bornkessel:
> My 2 channels on TeleColumbus in Berlin are encrypted on my system.
Maybe this channels are filtered.
See inside xxv - Setting > Channels > FilterCA
> Also, plz can you check the wml part for xxv mobile,
Please t
It's a pity, no answer.
I would like to note, that with vdr 1.7.7 is result same-NO video but audio is
OK.
Receiving these channels with sat boxes like dreambox or triple dragon is
without problem.
Thanks for any suggestions.
BR
Marky
-Original Message-
From: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [
On 04.05.2009 23:05, Marek Hajduk wrote:
> It's a pity, no answer.
> I would like to note, that with vdr 1.7.7 is result same-NO video but audio
> is OK.
> Receiving these channels with sat boxes like dreambox or triple dragon is
> without problem.
'1' is not a known video stream type in VDR.
T
On Monday 04 of May 2009, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 04.05.2009 23:05, Marek Hajduk wrote:
> > It's a pity, no answer.
> > I would like to note, that with vdr 1.7.7 is result same-NO video but
> > audio is OK. Receiving these channels with sat boxes like dreambox or
> > triple dragon is without
Many Thanks, Klaus.
It works. I will try to record several seconds, because picture has
errors.
once again, thanks for help.
BR
Marky
Klaus Schmidinger píše v Po 04. 05. 2009 v 23:34 +0200:
> On 04.05.2009 23:05, Marek Hajduk wrote:
> > It's a pity, no answer.
> > I would like to note, that
20 matches
Mail list logo
