Re: [vdr] A new possibility for lower power high performance VDR

I have myself thinked about the possibility of running vdr/xineliboutput client on low end systems that just have usb 2.0 but not any graphic cards or free pci slots available. Has anybody experiences from the "usb vga" or "usb dvi" graphic card adapters like these? http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/

Re: [vdr] vdr 1.7.4 & xineliboutput

> did you check it with dvb-s2 h264 hdtv channels too ? > At least arte worked for me about 1 or 2 week ago released xineliboutput cvs version. I however noticed it to be a little unstable in my system. (crashed much easier than 1.0.4 with 1.6.0) Mika

Re: [vdr] vdr 1.7.4 & xineliboutput

Hello, On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:10:26AM +0200, Mika Laitio wrote: > > did you check it with dvb-s2 h264 hdtv channels too ? > > > At least arte worked for me about 1 or 2 week ago released xineliboutput > cvs version. I however noticed it to be a little unstable in my system. > (crashed much ea

Re: [vdr] A new possibility for lower power high performance VDR

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Mika Laitio wrote: > I have myself thinked about the possibility of running vdr/xineliboutput > client on low end systems that just have usb 2.0 but not any graphic > cards or free pci slots available. > > Has anybody experiences from the "usb vga" or "usb dvi" gr

Re: [vdr] A new possibility for lower power high performance VDR

>> I have myself thinked about the possibility of running vdr/xineliboutput >> client on low end systems that just have usb 2.0 but not any graphic >> cards or free pci slots available. >> >> Has anybody experiences from the "usb vga" or "usb dvi" graphic card >> adapters like these? > > I think th

[vdr] [ANNOUNCE] vdr-iptv-0.2.5

Hi, a new IPTV plugin release is now available: http://www.saunalahti.fi/~rahrenbe/vdr/iptv/ 2009-03-08: Version 0.2.5 - Optimized TS packet data flow. - Refactored section filter class. - Cleaned up example scripts. - Fixed pid scanner to set the existing video stream type (Thanks to ua0ln

Re: [vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

>> some x-vdr users reported problems with compiling mplayer and some plug-ins >> like music too. We solved this by adding >> >> DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES >Why would this suddenly be necessary? I don't know, but it seems to work. Marc ___ v

Re: [vdr] Pvrinput and HVR1300

Martin Dauskardt kirjoitti: >> So does anyone know if the same applies for analogtv plugin also? >> >> \\Kartsa >> >> > Forget the analogtv-plugin. Development stopped years ago. It does not > support > the current v4l2 mpeg API, so even a PVR150/250/350 would not work. > > My advise: Sell y

[vdr] Clients with graphical output over USB (was: Re: A new possibility for lower power high performance VDR)

Dear Mika, Am Sonntag, den 08.03.2009, 10:53 +0200 schrieb Mika Laitio: > I have myself thinked about the possibility of running vdr/xineliboutput > client on low end systems that just have usb 2.0 but not any graphic > cards or free pci slots available. So, does that mean, those boards do not

Re: [vdr] A new possibility for lower power high performance VDR

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Mika Laitio wrote: > >> I have myself thinked about the possibility of running vdr/xineliboutput > >> client on low end systems that just have usb 2.0 but not any graphic > >> cards or free pci slots available. > >> > >> Has anybody experiences from the "usb vga" o