Hello!
Sure, there are plans to support vdr 1.7.4 but I didn't have the time
to setup vdr 1.7.4, do some recordings and modify VDRAdmin-AM.
But if you want you can provide some v1.7.4 recording folders but with
empty .ts files. Please send them personal email.
Regards,
Andreas
2009/2/4 Artem Ma
Hi,
When I click on "encode dvd" from vdrrip plugin menu, I have this error:
vdr[6891] general protection eip:80e6531 esp:bff26120 error:0
gdb stacktrace:
$ gdb ./vdr core.6891
[...]
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_files.so.2
Core was generated by `/vdr/VDR/vdr -w 60 -v /storage/re
nevermind schrieb:
> When I click on "encode dvd" from vdrrip plugin menu, I have this error:
How is this related to mp3-plugin (as mentioned in the subject)?
Regards
--
Stefan Huelswitt
s.huelsw...@gmx.de | http://www.muempf.de/
___
vdr mailing l
Stefan Huelswitt gmx.de> writes:
> How is this related to mp3-plugin (as mentioned in the subject)?
Sorry I made a mistake !!
wrong copy & paste on the subject :(
The correct is : "vdr 1.4.7 + vdrrip-0.3.0"
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
Hallo,
Andreas Mair schrieb:
Hello!
Sure, there are plans to support vdr 1.7.4 but I didn't have the time
to setup vdr 1.7.4, do some recordings and modify VDRAdmin-AM.
But if you want you can provide some v1.7.4 recording folders but with
empty .ts files. Please send them personal email.
Ic
Hi,
Due to an attempt on OS upgrade and thus kernel upgrade I'm grudgingly
(it worked for me for months with no issues so why would I want to
change it for now?) trying to make the transition from multiproto to
S2API. I have two DVB-T cards and a NOVA-S2-HD (HVR4000 lite). I have
downloaded a vani
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
wrote:
> Well, even using *any* version 1.7.x in a productive environment
> is a risk ;-)
[SNIP]
> S2API was necessary for HDTV channels, and recording HDTV channels
> only makes sense in TS. The PES recording of HDTV broadcasts was never
> offici
Op Wo, 4 februari, 2009 13:38, schreef Ales Jurik:
> -- SNIP --
> Hi,
>
Hello!
> I have it working with some dirty hacks (reelvdr svn 10388 - the latest
> with hdplayer). But for the problem with sending AC3 sound to ac3dec
> (with -a ac3dec) I didn't have enough time to solve. With sound over HD
Hi,
How is the picture quality with the eHD compared to using just x11 and
and DVI connected to a flatpanel? Is there a big difference?
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On Wednesday 04 of February 2009, Morfsta wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
>
> wrote:
> > Well, even using *any* version 1.7.x in a productive environment
> > is a risk ;-)
>
> [SNIP]
>
> > S2API was necessary for HDTV channels, and recording HDTV channels
> > only makes
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
wrote:
> Have you considered trying VDR 1.7.4?
Eek! Isn't that the one that even you don't consider using in a
productive environment? ;-)
I'm not sure about the TS stuff and how that works and also that I
won't be able to replay normal/HD recor
On Wednesday 04 of February 2009, Morfsta wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
>
> wrote:
> > Well, even using *any* version 1.7.x in a productive environment
> > is a risk ;-)
>
> [SNIP]
>
> > S2API was necessary for HDTV channels, and recording HDTV channels
> > only makes
Op Wo, 4 februari, 2009 13:22, schreef Morfsta:
> -- SNIP --
>
> The other problem is that I don't think anyone has got VDR 1.7.4
> working with the eHD yet, which is my output device... :-( So it seems
> everywhere I look at the moment I am stuck. :-(
>
This is indeed correct. The eHD (which I ha
>> The Multiproto channels.conf should be interchangeable with S2API. But
>> *some* modulation types didn't exist in S2API when I wrote the patches and
>> you need to check this for yourself. You need to check the settings (Red
>> button to edit in the TV Channels overview) and see if they are inde
Op Wo, 4 februari, 2009 10:16, schreef Morfsta:
> Hi,
>
Goodmorning!
> Due to an attempt on OS upgrade and thus kernel upgrade I'm grudgingly
> (it worked for me for months with no issues so why would I want to
> change it for now?) trying to make the transition from multiproto to
> S2API. I have
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Niels Wagenaar wrote:
> Goodmorning!
Morning Niels, thanks for getting back to me so quickly!
> You might want to try Igor's repo
> http://mercurial.intuxication.org/hg/s2-liplianin) since Steve's hasn't
> been updated for over 3 months. This however won't fix yo
On 04.02.2009 11:41, Morfsta wrote:
>...[ tunig problems ]
>
> Any suggestions?
Have you considered trying VDR 1.7.4?
Klaus
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On 04.02.2009 11:52, Morfsta wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
> wrote:
>> Have you considered trying VDR 1.7.4?
>
> Eek! Isn't that the one that even you don't consider using in a
> productive environment? ;-)
Well, even using *any* version 1.7.x in a productive enviro
> I still think it's a problem with the channel.conf. For fun, please try
> using the old and default scan for DVB-T. Because I used the old dvb-scan
> with the option to output for VDR on my Gigabyte GT-U7000-RH based DVB-T
> adapter to scan for KPN Digitenne bouquets (location Zwolle/Apeldoorn).
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
wrote:
>>> Have you considered trying VDR 1.7.4?
Klaus, 1.7.4 works fine with S2API and DVB-T here
Looks like there might be a problem in your patch somewhere Niels, but
not sure where? I would still prefer to use 1.7.0 if possible, as
expec
On Wednesday 04 February 2009, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 04.02.2009 11:52, Morfsta wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Have you considered trying VDR 1.7.4?
> >
> > Eek! Isn't that the one that even you don't consider using in a
> > productive envi
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 09:08:17AM +0100, Andreas Mair wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Sure, there are plans to support vdr 1.7.4 but I didn't have the time
> to setup vdr 1.7.4, do some recordings and modify VDRAdmin-AM.
I have attached a patch with makes vdradmin-am able to playback the new .ts
rec
Hi
Does vdr-1.7.4, ts recordings and and the S2API work under DVB-C?
I can't see why it wouldn't?
Dum question - where can I find the S2API repository? I just pulled the
latest v4l-dvb from linuxtv.org, but I get vdr compiling errors requesting
"version 5".
Thanks
Simon
On 04/02/2009 19:26, Simon Baxter wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does vdr-1.7.4, ts recordings and and the S2API work under DVB-C?
>
> I can't see why it wouldn't?
>
> Dum question - where can I find the S2API repository? I just pulled the
> latest v4l-dvb from linuxtv.org, but I get vdr compiling errors request
On Wednesday 04 of February 2009, Scott wrote:
> On 04/02/2009 19:26, Simon Baxter wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Does vdr-1.7.4, ts recordings and and the S2API work under DVB-C?
> >
> > I can't see why it wouldn't?
> >
> > Dum question - where can I find the S2API repository? I just pulled the
> > latest
Hi,
These buttons, the ones with the diode like pictures on them, dont seem
to have enum entries in keys.h, is that correct? I see that
green/yellow can be used for these functions, but what is the philosophy
for what goes in the enum. Just curious.
--
Scott
On 04.02.2009 21:11, Scott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These buttons, the ones with the diode like pictures on them, dont seem
> to have enum entries in keys.h, is that correct? I see that
> green/yellow can be used for these functions, but what is the philosophy
> for what goes in the enum. Just curiou
> Due to an attempt on OS upgrade and thus kernel upgrade I'm grudgingly
> (it worked for me for months with no issues so why would I want to
> change it for now?) trying to make the transition from multiproto to
> S2API. I have two DVB-T cards and a NOVA-S2-HD (HVR4000 lite). I have
> downloaded a
Hi
I'm trying to patch the latest xine-lib sources supplied on
http://home.vrweb.de/rnissl/
I see the patching mechanism has been changed in this version - and I now
get this error:
[r...@freddy development]# ls xine-lib
AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING CREDITS doc lib Makefile.am
Hi Klaus,
Klaus Schmidinger schrieb:
> DO NOT USE THIS VERSION FOR PRODUCTIVE RECORDINGS!!
> THE RECORDING OR OTHER FILE FORMATS MAY STILL CHANGE
> AND ANY RECORDINGS MADE WITH THIS VERSION MIGHT NOT
> WORK WITH FUTURE VERSIONS!
do you think that this will really change in the future?
If I record
>> I'm trying to patch the latest xine-lib sources supplied on
>> http://home.vrweb.de/rnissl/
>>
>> I see the patching mechanism has been changed in this version - and I now
>> get this error:
>>
>> [r...@freddy development]# patch -d. -p0 --dry-run <
>> ~/vdr-1.7.4/PLUGINS/src/xine/patches/xine-l
31 matches
Mail list logo
