Re: [vdr] Which extension for TS files?

2009-01-06 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Sunday 04 January 2009, Vladimir Kangin wrote: > You right. For example I'm keen of LinuxMCE (www.linuxmce.org) and it > has a script that looking for media files, thus all .vdr are recognised > as a video files of VDR while is not. It would would be a very wise step > to improve this at the sa

Re: [vdr] Support for different frame rates? (Re: Frames per second PAL vs. NTSC)

2009-01-06 Thread Theunis Potgieter
On 05/01/2009, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Pasi Juppo wrote: > > > Would this be possible to implement? > > > There's already a modeswitching patch using xrandr for vdr-sxfe > available on VDR-Portal. However, it lacks support for interpreting > frame rate of source video, but i

Re: [vdr] 1:1 pixel mapping - a waste of time?

2009-01-06 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:17:52AM +0200, Jukka Vaisanen wrote: > Yes, it's a good idea to get 1:1 pixel mapping on your display. Double > scaling (first pc, then display) is not a good idea, ever. > > But, some problems arise: > > HDMI uses DVI signalling for the video (and audio is hidden in a

Re: [vdr] Which extension for TS files?

2009-01-06 Thread reinhard . buchner
Hi guys, Klaus wrote: > I've already dropped them. > Besides, these files are just auxiliary internal files for VDR's > very own purposes. There should normally be no need to edit them at all. I'm writing from work (webmail), so sorry if the email format gets fudged up. I never really liked the

Re: [vdr] 1:1 pixel mapping - a waste of time?

2009-01-06 Thread jori.hamalainen
> I don't know how to do the latter, and even if it is possible in all > cases. In my setup, I have set up my video card to 1:1 to the panel I > have (fullHD), since I have material in several different resolutions, This is the theory. But you need to remember that you are using TV set as a monit

Re: [vdr] ANNOUNCE vdr-ttxtsubs 0.0.8

2009-01-06 Thread Tobi
Antti Hartikainen wrote: > Solution so far has been to use little transparent background, but it looks > ugly, not like "normal > text" should look like (white text with few pixels thick black border) I think VDR doesn't support drawing an outlined OSD text. The only way to do this, might be t

Re: [vdr] 1:1 pixel mapping - a waste of time?

2009-01-06 Thread Seppo Ingalsuo
Jukka Vaisanen wrote: > HDMI uses DVI signalling for the video (and audio is hidden in a > vertical blanking time slot believe it or not) so it may seem like just > another connector.. however in their finite wisdom the HDMI > standardization people decided that HDMI will not support arbitrary > re

[vdr] Welcome to Linux DVB VDR voice chat

2009-01-06 Thread Goga777
Dears for discussion about any Linux DVB VDR questions you can join to voice Linux DVB VDR chat. You have to install the Mumble client aptitude install mumble or http://mumble.sourceforge.net/Installing_Mumble server address is vdr-settings.com port 64738 currently there are Russian, Ge

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.2

2009-01-06 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, APIVERSION should have been changed to 1.7.1 at release 1.7.1 already as it introduced cDevice::PlayTs() and vdr-xine-0.9.0 relies on APIVERSION >= 10701 to support vdr-1.7.2. When switching from a TV channel to a radio channel, vpid isn't reset in cPatPmtParser and hence, vdr-xine-0.9.0 wait

Re: [vdr] 1:1 pixel mapping - a waste of time?

2009-01-06 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:17:52AM +0200, Jukka Vaisanen wrote: > Yes, it's a good idea to get 1:1 pixel mapping on your display. Double > scaling (first pc, then display) is not a good idea, ever. > > But, some problems arise: > > HDMI uses DVI signalling for the video (and audio is hidden in a

Re: [vdr] Support for different frame rates? (Re: Frames per second PAL vs. NTSC)

2009-01-06 Thread Tony Houghton
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:12:04 +0200 Pasi Juppo wrote: > I checked boxstar web-page (http://boxstar.sourceforge.net/index.html) > and I have to say that the goal of the project is ambiguous. Hopefully > the developer can actually do it. Do you mean ambitious? Yes, it is going to be a big challenge

Re: [vdr] 1:1 pixel mapping - a waste of time?

2009-01-06 Thread Tony Houghton
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:23:51 +0200 "Jukka Vaisanen" wrote: > 24p is just a framerate, in HD it's actually 1080p but with 24 frames > per second instead of 60. There are also NTSC DVDs with 24p video but > that's a whole different story that we won't get into.. Yes, I know, but what's the differen

Re: [vdr] Support for different frame rates? (Re: Frames per second PAL vs. NTSC)

2009-01-06 Thread Mika Laitio
>> I checked boxstar web-page (http://boxstar.sourceforge.net/index.html) >> and I have to say that the goal of the project is ambiguous. Hopefully >> the developer can actually do it. > > Do you mean ambitious? Yes, it is going to be a big challenge, but > hopefully it'll get there one day. At le

Re: [vdr] 1:1 pixel mapping - a waste of time?

2009-01-06 Thread Ville Aakko
2009/1/6 : > >> I don't know how to do the latter, and even if it is possible in all >> cases. In my setup, I have set up my video card to 1:1 to the panel I >> have (fullHD), since I have material in several different resolutions, > > This is the theory. But you need to remember that you are usin

Re: [vdr] 1:1 pixel mapping - a waste of time?

2009-01-06 Thread Tony Houghton
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:29:55 + Scott wrote: > As Im just starting to get vdr working, I was wondering if 1:1 pixel > mapping between the video card (nvidia onboard HDMI output) and my > flat panel (Samsung plasma) is a waste of time. When looking at a > "computer" generated image like the des

[vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
VDR developer version 1.7.3 is now available at ftp://ftp.cadsoft.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.3.tar.bz2 A 'diff' against the previous version is available at ftp://ftp.cadsoft.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.2-1.7.3.diff WARNING: This is a *developer* version. Not even *I* use it

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 06.01.2009 16:06, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > ... > The "frame duration" (in multiples of 1/9) is stored in the info.vdr > file using the new tag F Sorry, this is actually the "frames per second" ("frame duration" was my initial approach, and apparently I haven't updated the HISTORY

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-06 Thread Rolf Ahrenberg
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: - cDvbDevice now uses the FE_CAN_2G_MODULATION flag to determine whether a device can handle DVB-S2. The #define is still there to allow people with older drivers who don't need DVB-S2 to use this version without pathcing. Sorry for hijacking th

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 06.01.2009 17:32, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > >> - cDvbDevice now uses the FE_CAN_2G_MODULATION flag to determine >> whether a device >> can handle DVB-S2. The #define is still there to allow people with >> older drivers >> who don't need DVB-S2 to u

Re: [vdr] Support for different frame rates? (Re: Frames per second PAL vs. NTSC)

2009-01-06 Thread Tony Houghton
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:47:35 +0200 (EET) Mika Laitio wrote: > >> I checked boxstar web-page (http://boxstar.sourceforge.net/index.html) > >> and I have to say that the goal of the project is ambiguous. Hopefully > >> the developer can actually do it. > > > > Do you mean ambitious? Yes, it is going

Re: [vdr] Support for different frame rates? (Re: Frames per second PAL vs. NTSC)

2009-01-06 Thread Pasi Juppo
Tony Houghton wrote: > On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:12:04 +0200 > Pasi Juppo wrote: > > >> I checked boxstar web-page (http://boxstar.sourceforge.net/index.html) >> and I have to say that the goal of the project is ambiguous. Hopefully >> the developer can actually do it. >> > > Do you mean ambi

Re: [vdr] Support for different frame rates?

2009-01-06 Thread Pasi Juppo
Tony Houghton wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:47:35 +0200 (EET) > Mika Laitio wrote: > > I checked boxstar web-page (http://boxstar.sourceforge.net/index.html) and I have to say that the goal of the project is ambiguous. Hopefully the developer can actually do it. >>

[vdr] Boxstar plans (was Re: Support for different frame rates?)

2009-01-06 Thread Tony Houghton
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:47:14 +0200 Pasi Juppo wrote: > Few comments/suggestions to boxstar: > -roadmap: boxtar itself does not seem to show EPG unless it is > incorporated into manage timers and recordings. Anyhow, I really hope > you implement TVOnScreen type of EPG viewer and similar EPG search

Re: [vdr] 1:1 pixel mapping - a waste of time?

2009-01-06 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Ville Aakko wrote: > On my Sony it is called "Täyskuiva" (in finnish), Heh, is this spelling error yours or Sony's? :) ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[vdr] [ANNOUNCE] vdr-femon-1.6.6/1.7.1

2009-01-06 Thread Rolf Ahrenberg
An updated Femon plugin is now available for both vdr-1.6.x and vdr-1.7.x branches. These versions should fix the reported leaking of frontend file handles. http://www.saunalahti.fi/~rahrenbe/vdr/femon/ BR, -- rofa ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.o