On 08.12.2008 06:03, VDR User wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 07.12.2008 18:40, gimli wrote:
>>> Hi Klaus,
>>>
>>> just one question. Do you also use a budget system ?
>>> If so, how do you watch TV with vdr 1.7.1 and later ;)
>>> since
Klaus Schmidinger schrieb:
> On 08.12.2008 06:03, VDR User wrote:
>
>> Just curious why you prefer that setup instead of going the budget
>> route for the same or less cost?
>>
>
> Well, because I already have several of these FF cards, and it's
> so easy to set up a VDR with them.
>
>
>
On 07/12/2008, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apart from that the TS data stream will be saved
> exactly as it comes in.
So will it then also record encrypted streams just as it was, or will
it save in unencrypted form?
>
>
> Klaus
>
On 08.12.2008 10:08, Theunis Potgieter wrote:
> On 07/12/2008, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Apart from that the TS data stream will be saved
>> exactly as it comes in.
> So will it then also record encrypted streams just as it was, or will
> it save in unencrypted form?
It w
> FF seems to have understandably gone the way of the dinosaur.
>
But the dinosaur is still the best choice to get the best picture quality on a
PAL CRT TV !
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On 08/12/2008, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08.12.2008 10:08, Theunis Potgieter wrote:
> > On 07/12/2008, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Apart from that the TS data stream will be saved
> >> exactly as it comes in.
> > So will it then also record en
Hi,
Reinhard Nissl wrote:
>
> Is there a regular chance for you to reproduce this issue?
>
> I could send you a code fragment then which would store a
> reasonably sized fragment of the TS stream which would help me
> very much in solving this issue.
>
It hasn't happened again yet, and I don't
Hi,
I don't like the hd discusion because we don't have
any tv's which are build using a well developed standard.
E. G.
You can buy a lcd tv and after two years you can't use it's
hdmi connectiorr of hdmi revision 599,95.0
hd ready->full-hd/hdmi1.1, 1.2 1.3 .
I read something about limitatio
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:19:24PM +0200, Theunis Potgieter wrote:
> On 08/12/2008, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Currently it creates a new one, but I guess this should be changed to
> > continue an existing file (if the file size limit hasn't been exceeded,
> > yet).
> FF seems to have understandably gone the way of the dinosaur.
It has been true for the older FF cards, but there might be a
possible new generation/revolution of FF cards, though it was
originally considered expensive sometime back.
Other than for the FF cards, there are cards (not in retai
On 08.12.2008 12:34, Morfsta wrote:
> ...
> Any idea when TS will be implemented? Its been talked about for a long
> time now... :-(
It's pretty much the next thing on my list, once the S2API switch
is done.
Klaus
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
h
Hello,
I experience some strange behavior with vdr and a plain full featured
Technotrend Rev. 1.6 (no mods, no daughterboards, no usage of internal
connectors):
When running VDR (version 1.6.0-2/1.6.0) after a few days the live tv on
the composite out goes away (only black picture visible). Th
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might be a bit more time, to know the actual status, but the TS
> feature might be a still important feature, if that were to happen.
I am an eHD user and I'm hoping that the TS feature might improve
things as currently
On 08.12.2008 11:13, Artem Makhutov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> On 08.12.2008 10:49, Holger Rusch wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> FF seems to have understandably gone the way of the dinosaur.
But the dinosaur i
-Original message-
From: Holger Rusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon 08-12-2008 11:22
To: VDR Mailing List ;
Subject: Re: [vdr] VDR with S2API (update)
> Hi,
>
> Klaus Schmidinger schrieb:
> >> FF will die in a years or two (months?) i guess and vdr has no well
> >> integrated outputs.
>
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>> FF seems to have understandably gone the way of the dinosaur.
> But the dinosaur is still the best choice to get the best picture
> quality on a PAL CRT TV !
But for anybody who wants to use a beamer these FF-cards are full pain
with there stupid outputs. I (and
On 08/12/2008, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Currently it creates a new one, but I guess this should be changed to
> continue an existing file (if the file size limit hasn't been exceeded, yet).
> If file splitting is removed, then it would of course continue the (one and
> on
Hi,
Klaus Schmidinger schrieb:
>> FF will die in a years or two (months?) i guess and vdr has no well
>> integrated outputs.
> Is there anything in the VDR plugin API that would prevent a plugin
> from implementing a suitable output device?
I guess not, but there are (from my view as user with k
On 8 Dec 2008, at 19:22, Theunis Potgieter wrote:
> What is the best FF hardware solution if you have in my case only one
> provider, which means one smartcard. But you want to watch an
> encrypted channel on one transponder and record another on a different
> transponder from the same provider.
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> > Is there any movement to files >2GB for the recordings?
>
> I will most likely change this when going to TS recording format.
> In doing so, I'd like to get rid of splitting recordings into separate
> files altogether. However,
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 08.12.2008 10:49, Holger Rusch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> >>> FF seems to have understandably gone the way of the dinosaur.
> >> But the dinosaur is still the best choice to get the best picture
>
On 08.12.2008 10:49, Holger Rusch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>>> FF seems to have understandably gone the way of the dinosaur.
>> But the dinosaur is still the best choice to get the best picture
>> quality on a PAL CRT TV !
>
> But for anybody who wants to use a beamer these FF-
Jochen Heuer a écrit :
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>>> Is there any movement to files >2GB for the recordings?
>> I will most likely change this when going to TS recording format.
>> In doing so, I'd like to get rid of splitting recordings into separate
>> f
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Klaus Schmidinger <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any movement to files >2GB for the recordings?
> I will most likely change this when going to TS recording format.
> In doing so, I'd like to get rid of splitting recordings into separate
> files altogether
On 08.12.2008 16:34, Alex Betis wrote:
> ...
> Klaus, I've asked about the size of recording in TS format that you
> probably missed (or ignored :)).
> Will there be more overhead compared to currently recorded format?
There may be a small overhead, but with today's huge disks this should
be negli
Just some small comments..
I don't think I argue against FF (btw, my main vdr box has two Nexus-s
in it), more along the lines of argue for other/better options of the
current times. Sure, FF was a great choice for it's day but that day
has moved on in my opinion. Maybe it was never intended tha
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Halim Sahin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I don't like the hd discusion because we don't have
> any tv's which are build using a well developed standard.
> E. G.
> You can buy a lcd tv and after two years you can't use it's
> hdmi connectiorr of hdmi revision 59
Am Montag, 8. Dezember 2008 schrieb Marco Schinkel:
> Hello,
>
> I experience some strange behavior with vdr and a plain full featured
> Technotrend Rev. 1.6 (no mods, no daughterboards, no usage of internal
> connectors):
>
> When running VDR (version 1.6.0-2/1.6.0) after a few days the live tv on
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> Is there any movement to files >2GB for the recordings?
>
> I will most likely change this when going to TS recording format.
> In doing so, I'd like to get rid of splitting recordings into separate
> files altogether. However, I think there might be people who still
>
Hi,
On Mo, Dez 08, 2008 at 10:28:30 -0800, VDR User wrote:
V> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Halim Sahin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I don't like the hd discusion because we don't have
> > any tv's which are build using a well developed standard.
> > E. G.
> > You can buy a lcd tv and a
Hi,
Andreas Pickart schrieb:
>> Is there a regular chance for you to reproduce this issue?
>>
>> I could send you a code fragment then which would store a
>> reasonably sized fragment of the TS stream which would help me
>> very much in solving this issue.
>
> It hasn't happened again yet, and I
Udo Richter wrote:
> Second: Priority and Lifetime of a recording IMHO don't belong to the
> name part. This could easily fit into the info.vdr file instead. Or does
> it make sense to have the same recording with different lifetime or
> priority in separate folders?
No and it actually causes p
> But for anybody who wants to use a beamer these FF-cards are full pain
> with there stupid outputs. I (and many others) want DVI/HDMI/Display-Port.
And I want beamer that has a network card and can download and show the
content downloaded from vdr server. I don't know whether they
could connect
> BTW. Softdevice/play, vdr-xine and xineliboutput are able to play youtube divx
> etc.
Is there btw any vdr-plugin for browsing you tupe content (like most
watched, movie trailers, etc...) and playing them.
Another nice plugin would be a something where you could select some of
your recordings
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Halim Sahin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It makes no sense to me supporting something
> which can't be used with hdtv stuff in one year!
HDMI isn't going anywhere any time soon. Neither is h264, or anything
else so can you give us some examples of things you thin
Hi,
search for webvideo plugin.
It works for me!
On Di, Dez 09, 2008 at 01:04:58 +0200, Mika Laitio wrote:
> > BTW. Softdevice/play, vdr-xine and xineliboutput are able to play youtube
> > divx
> > etc.
>
> Is there btw any vdr-plugin for browsing you tupe content (like most
> watched, movie t
36 matches
Mail list logo
