[vdr] VDR Development

2008-09-04 Thread Morfsta
Hi, Does anyone know what is happening with VDR development these days? There doesn't seem to be much activity - is Klaus taking a long holiday or very busy with work!? :-) Please don't flame me for asking - I totally understand and appreciate that Klaus does it in his spare time etc and we have

Re: [vdr] VDR Development

2008-09-04 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 09/04/08 12:38, Morfsta wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know what is happening with VDR development these days? > There doesn't seem to be much activity - is Klaus taking a long > holiday or very busy with work!? :-) > > Please don't flame me for asking - I totally understand and appreciate > tha

Re: [vdr] VDR Development

2008-09-04 Thread Morfsta
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This summer I had quite a few other things to do, and many times > the weather was just too good to sit by the PC and do programming. > > I do intend to continue working on VDR, and I sure hope to find > more time for

Re: [vdr] VDR Development

2008-09-04 Thread VDR User
What ever happened to the idea of setting up VDR deveopment on mercurial to allow the main contributors who want to work on it to do so without hassle/delay? I think converting to mpeg-ts instead of pes, and the hdtv support + all things related would be much farther along by now! Cheers ___

Re: [vdr] VDR Development

2008-09-04 Thread Udo Richter
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 09/04/08 12:38, Morfsta wrote: >> Does anyone know what is happening with VDR development these days? >> There doesn't seem to be much activity - is Klaus taking a long >> holiday or very busy with work!? :-) > > This summer I had quite a few other things to do, and m

Re: [vdr] new dvb api ?

2008-09-04 Thread Jelle De Loecker
I was wondering what the people on the VDR ml thought about this. Now that multiproto is finally complete, and VDR has excellent support for it, some people want to create a completely new API. They say this is so that future modulations could be better supported, but multiproto can offer that

Re: [vdr] new dvb api ?

2008-09-04 Thread VDR User
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Jelle De Loecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering what the people on the VDR ml thought about this. > > Now that multiproto is finally complete, and VDR has excellent support for > it, some people want to create a completely new API. They say this is so