> > This sounds very good for HDTV setups which apparently all imply xorg,
> > but what about DirectFB, does this HUD implementation also work there?
have you good experience with HD video 1080i video from satellites and DirectFB
?
is it better than X- Window solution ?
Goga
_
> Who can tell me what should I do next?
please try this patched channelscan version
http://slil.ru/25968343
btw - the new multiproto patch for svn version of channelscan will appreciate
:)
Goga
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.lin
Artur Skawina schrieb:
> Wolfgang Fritz wrote:
>> Artur Skawina schrieb:
>>> Peer Oliver Schmidt wrote:
Hello Michael,
> Does anybody use RF remote control with VDR instead of IR? How to
> configure such remotes?
I used the ATI RemoteWonder with it. LIRC has support for it.
You can use "make menuconfig" in /usr/src/multiproto and find the following
information:
Empia EM2800/2820/2840 USB video capture support (VIDEO_EM28XX) [N/m/?]
Key the "N".
Last,repeat "make".> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: vdr Digest, Vol 42,
Issue 11> To: vdr@linuxtv.org> Date: Sat,
Using Femon 1.6.1 with VDR 1.7.0 and multiproto shows
odd parameter values, maybe Femon needs a patch ?
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
I download the channelscan_multiproto.tgz，But It couldn't be compiled under
vdr-1.7.0.
debian:~/vdr/PLUGINS/src/# wget
http://slil.ru/25968343/456f10de.487a6a78/channelscan_multiproto.tgzdebian:~/vdr/PLUGINS/src/#
tar zxvf channelscan_multiproto.tgzdebian:~/vdr# make cleandebian:~/vdr# make
Wolfgang Fritz wrote:
> Artur Skawina schrieb:
>> sure, patch vs 2.6.25 below. These are just the minimal changes needed to
>> make
>> ati-remote work w/ one type of medion rf remotes (P/N 20018071). i did this
>
> Mine is P/N 20014751
afaict it looks exactly like the one i'm using.
>> The key
I demand that LinHai may or may not have written...
[snip]
> Plugin channelscan:make[1]: Entering directory
`/root/vdr/PLUGINS/src/channelscan'g++ -g -O2 -Wall -Woverloaded-virtual
-Wno-parentheses -c -D_GNU_SOURCE -DPLUGIN_NAME_I18N='"reelchannelscan"'
-DVDRDIR=\"../../..\" -DBOOST_IOSTREAMS_NO_L
> Using Femon 1.6.1 with VDR 1.7.0 and multiproto shows
> odd parameter values, maybe Femon needs a patch ?
what do you mean - odd ? There's some missing parameters, I wrote about this on
this week
Goga
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www
Goga777 wrote:
>> Using Femon 1.6.1 with VDR 1.7.0 and multiproto shows
>> odd parameter values, maybe Femon needs a patch ?
>
> what do you mean - odd ? There's some missing parameters, I wrote about this
> on this week
Odd, as strange, ie. Bandwidth is reported as 7Mhz when it should be 8Mhz
a
Goga777 wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm using the latest femon + vdr 170 + h.264 patch. If I will watch h264
> dvb-s2 channels than some information in femon is
> missing -
>
> Apid - 0
> Spid - 0
> Aspect ratio - reserved
> Frame rate - 0.00 Hz
> Video format - unknown
> Resolution - 0x0
>
> Information
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Lauri Tischler wrote:
> With DVB-T those are ok, but missing are
> Transmission ---
> Modulation ---
> Coderate --- (H) --- (L)
> Guard---
> and Bandwith is reported as 7Mhz, should be 8Mhz
The current femon plugin doesn't support multiproto, but for my
knowled
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Goga777 wrote:
> Apid - 0
> Spid - 0
The pids should work - I cannot see why multiproto/h264/S2 would affect
them.
> Aspect ratio - reserved
> Frame rate - 0.00 Hz
> Video format - unknown
> Resolution - 0x0
> Information about audio stream - #0
> bitrate - free (0 kbit/s)
>
Rolf Ahrenberg wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Lauri Tischler wrote:
>
>> With DVB-T those are ok, but missing are
>> Transmission ---
>> Modulation ---
>> Coderate --- (H) --- (L)
>> Guard---
>> and Bandwith is reported as 7Mhz, should be 8Mhz
>
> The current femon plugin doesn't sup
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008, Sebastian Dellit wrote:
Hi,
> I have test the femon again.
> I'm sorry but I can't read any kind of information. The screen is
> blank.
That's a shame. I quess I'd need a Braille display (and a person who can
use it) for making it to work.
BR,
--
rofa
_
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Lauri Tischler wrote:
> There are differences between 1.4.x and 1.7.0
..but the common parameters are the same, so I cannot say where the
problem might be until I (or someone else) have debugged it.
BR,
--
rofa
___
vdr mailing li
Matthias Fechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lauri Tischler wrote:
> > I think your dish has moved or coaxial is broken.
> no the second card is working fine and all other cards in the house too.
> And that the cable breaks when no one touch it is nearly impossible.
If I were you I'd definitely
> > Apid - 0
> > Spid - 0
>
> The pids should work - I cannot see why multiproto/h264/S2 would affect
> them.
where from does femon read apid/vpid ? from channels.conf or from dvb stream
directly (service table)?
in both cases I don't understand how the multiproto can influence on this issue
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Goga777 wrote:
> where from does femon read apid/vpid ? from channels.conf or from dvb stream
> directly (service table)?
> in both cases I don't understand how the multiproto can influence on this
> issue
The pids are read directly from VDR's cChannels class:
cChannel::Ap
19 matches
Mail list logo
