[vdr] OT: Pseudo-real-time h264 transcoding of mpeg2 vdr recordings

2008-01-15 Thread Magnus Hörlin
I'm sorry for bothering you with a question that should possibly have been sent to the mplayer mailing list. Next week I'm going to Tenerife to relax by the pool, but I don't want to miss any biathlon, alpine- or cross-country skiing transmissions, because then I can't relax Therefore I have ma

Re: [vdr] OT: Pseudo-real-time h264 transcoding of mpeg2 vdr recordings

2008-01-15 Thread Matthias Schniedermeyer
On 15.01.2008 09:35, Magnus Hörlin wrote: > I'm sorry for bothering you with a question that should possibly have been > sent to the mplayer mailing list. > Next week I'm going to Tenerife to relax by the pool, but I don't want to > miss any biathlon, alpine- or cross-country skiing transmissions,

Re: [vdr] vdr + h264

2008-01-15 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 01/15/08 08:53, Stefan Lucke wrote: > On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Reinhard Nissl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Stefan Lucke schrieb: >> >>> is it correct that h264 is written as PES via PlayVideo() ? >>> >>> For decoding with ffmpeg it would be useful to have a >>> PROGRAM_STREAM_MAP in front of a new vi

Re: [vdr] OT: Pseudo-real-time h264 transcoding of mpeg2 vdr recordings

2008-01-15 Thread André Weidemann
Magnus Hörlin wrote: -snip- > then I can't relax Therefore I have made a script that scans my video > dir for new recordings -snip- Have you tried the "-r" option? You can start a conversion after the file has been recorded completly. Take a look here: http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/

Re: [vdr] vdr + h264

2008-01-15 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Stefan Lucke wrote: > On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Reinhard Nissl wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Stefan Lucke schrieb: > > > > > is it correct that h264 is written as PES via PlayVideo() ? > > > > > > For decoding with ffmpeg it would be useful to have a > > > PROGRAM_STREAM_

Re: [vdr] streamdev-client multiple servers

2008-01-15 Thread Pjotr Kourzanov
Олег, et al., Yes, I thought about that (It would work even better if you replace /bin/cp with /bin/ln:), but still, wouldn't a solution with one plugin work better, namely, I've noticed that the start-up latency of VDR depends largely on a number of loaded plugins. Another solution that wo

Re: [vdr] vdr 1.5.13 (and earlier)

2008-01-15 Thread Tony Grant
Le dimanche 13 janvier 2008 à 22:35 +0100, Gregoire Favre a écrit : > ITV1 > London;BSkyB:10758:vC56S0Z0:S28.2E:22000:2305:2310=eng,2314=NAR:2315:0:10060:2:2044:0 I have recorded from it and can see recording but it is not visible as live TV Does that help? Tony -- __

Re: [vdr] H.264 VPID's

2008-01-15 Thread ShorTie
Many thankz once again Reinhard Nissl, yes it keeps vdr from removing the 1, but it kills the video on h.264 channels .. :/~ I get a picture but no motion and normally a green line across the tv. In looking thru messages I see see stuff like this ERROR: H264::cContext::ActivateSPS(): id out of ra

Re: [vdr] vdr + h264

2008-01-15 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Stefan Lucke schrieb: > The bad thing is, PSM info should be repeated more often, as the decoder > may reset itself due to bad reception (ahead of each video packet ??). > > Or is there a simpler way to recognize h264 (or other codecs) > as Klaus demands? In VDR context, you may want to use

Re: [vdr] H.264 VPID's

2008-01-15 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, ShorTie schrieb: > Many thankz once again Reinhard Nissl, yes it keeps vdr from removing the 1, > but it kills the video on h.264 channels .. :/~ I do not see, how this can happen due to the cheat. > I get a picture but no motion and normally a green line across the tv. > > In looking thru

Re: [vdr] BUG: DVB-T and DVB-S[2] do not work with VDR & multiproto

2008-01-15 Thread Manu Abraham
Reinhard Nissl wrote: > Hi, > > Morfsta schrieb: > >>> Please report the debug output here for further investigation. >> Attached are two files - tuning to the same DVB-T channel using either >> system and the Philips frontend... vdr-1.4.x shows the channel fine, >> 1.5.12 does not. >> >> Hope th

Re: [vdr] H.264 VPID's

2008-01-15 Thread Christian Tramnitz
I guess that's caused by an offset defined in the patch: vdr-1.5.12-dvbs2-h264-syncearly-framespersec-audioindexer-fielddetection-speedup.diff: #define VPID_OFFSET_BASE 1 I don't know what it does or is meant to do, but I also have wrong pids in my channels.conf Best regards,

[vdr] vdr 1.5.13 & dvb-s2 H.264 patch from Reinhard

2008-01-15 Thread Igor
Dear Reinhard are you planning to release the cumulate dvb-s2 h.264 patch for vdr 1.5.13 ? 10x very much for your contribution in hdtv-future for VDR project Igor ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vd

Re: [vdr] vdr 1.5.13 & dvb-s2 H.264 patch from Reinhard

2008-01-15 Thread Grégoire FAVRE
Hello :-) The version for vdr-1.5.12 still apply and works :-) On Jan 16, 2008 7:57 AM, Igor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Reinhard > > are you planning to release the cumulate dvb-s2 h.264 patch for vdr 1.5.13 ? > > 10x very much for your contribution in hdtv-future for VDR project > > Igor