2007/11/21, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> They have saved quite a few recordings for me.
> But since they are so "idiotic" (which, I guess, makes me the idiot,
> since I've implemented them), I'll make them configurable soon.
Oh, sorry, I didn't mean it personally (really!). I was just
Hello,
lign 105 of dvbsubtitle.c is :
bool Decode8BppCodeString(const uchar *Data, int &Index, int&y, int y);
shouldn't that be :
bool Decode8BppCodeString(const uchar *Data, int &Index, int&x, int y);
Or better all 3 advanced declarations ligns :
bool Decode2BppCodeString(const uchar *, int &,
Hi,
Ville Aakko schrieb:
> On 18.11. I upgraded to
> 1.5.11 from 1.5.10, and afterwards, ALL recordings with subtitles have
> had these restarts. I get no such problems if I'm recording a channel
> without subtitles or just watch a program with subtitles (or without).
Release 1.5.11 fixed one su
On 11/18/07 23:32, Segers,Jan J.K.T. wrote:
>> But AFAICS unfortunately no gigabit Ethernet (which I'd like have in order
>> to record to my server).
>
> how about the ASUS P5GC ?
Well, looks like the ASUS P5GC is going to be the board for my
new-to-build VDR:
http://de.asus.com/products.aspx?l1
>So the next question is: which CPU to use?
i would definitely go for the intel core2duo e4300. have a look here:
http://www.hardtecs4u.de/reviews/2007/intel_e6420_e4300/index6.php
beside its low power consumption it offers also two cores, which might be handy.
--
Jan
On 11/19/07 00:25, Jörg Knitter wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger schrieb:
>> I don't want to lose the ability to record 3 DVB-S transponders
>> in parallel, and I also need the DVB-T card.
>>
>>
> Have you ever thought about a USB solution? I also would prefer PCI, but
> I also could not believe that
>So the next question is: which CPU to use?
>http://support.asus.com/cpusupport/cpusupport.aspx?SLanguage=de-de&model=P5
GC
>lists all the CPUs this board supports, and since they are probably
>all way faster than I'll actually need, it's probably best to use
>the one with the lowest power consum
On Nov 21, 2007 1:54 PM, Daniel Heuwinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I have read over the last few months I would recommend either the
> Core 2 Duo E4300 (1.8GHz,800FSB,L2:2MB,65W,rev.L2) or the
> Pentium Dual Core E2140(1.6GHz, 800FSB, L2 1MB, rev.L2)
It should be noted that Core Duo
On Wednesday 21 of November 2007, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> lists all the CPUs this board supports, and since they are probably
> all way faster than I'll actually need, it's probably best to use
> the one with the lowest power consumption.
> Does anybody know which of these has the lowest power r
>It should be noted that Core Duo and Core 2 Duo are not the same.
>Core 2 Duo uses the new architecture while Core Duo does not. Unless
>the price difference is drastic between your considerations, I would
>absolutely go with the Core 2 Duo.
The Pentium Duo I referred to is not a Core Duo but a
On Nov 21, 2007 2:47 PM, Daniel Heuwinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Pentium Duo I referred to is not a Core Duo but a Pentium Dual Core[1]
> "These closely resembled the Core 2 Duo E4300 processor with the exception of
> having 1 MB L2 cache instead of 2 MB"
Sorry, I misread your post.
/f
11 matches
Mail list logo
