On 7/1/07, VDR User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately I don't have a patch to vdr to handle this but it's
better then having to install X and all the other unnecessary
packages... You can compile and use v4l2-ctl from the current
mercurial v4l drivers located in the v4l-dvb/v4l2-apps/uti
On 7/1/07, Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/1/07, VDR User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately I don't have a patch to vdr to handle this but it's
> better then having to install X and all the other unnecessary
> packages... You can compile and use v4l2-ctl from the current
> me
Georg Acher schrieb
[ ... snip ... ]
>Well, you don't have to buy the card if you would wake up in cold sweat
>every once in a while because of the small binary-only part in the kernel.
>
>But IMO you can wait until the end of time for a full open source HDTV card
>with HDMI output. If you have t
Brendon Higgins wrote:
> Jun 30 21:12:55 phi vdr: [3452] frontend 0 timed out while tuning to channel
> 0, tp 536
>
> I'm a bit confused that it's
> trying to access channel 0, since AFAICT there is *no* channel 0.
'Channel 0' is usually the scan for new channels on currently unused
transponde
Hi,
Oliver Endriss wrote:
> Are there any FTA NTSC transmissions on Astra 19.2°
> or Eutelsat 13°? I'd like to do some tests...
Pentagon Channel:11095:hC34:S13.0E:28000:810:800,802,804:0:0:8:6:301:0
Bye.
--
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Georg Acher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From a technical view this is right, but with just a component output
> you can't sell a HDTV decoder card nowadays. And HDMI is not only
> about encryption but also contains audio encapsulation. And that is
> an argument for HDMI vs. DVI...
true.
> HDCP
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:34:14AM +0200, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> Another thing: Will it have a proper framebuffer ? I mean the main
> problem of the current FF cards is that you can't do a lot of things
> because of the very limited OSD. ScumVM etc pp would be a really nice
> thing.
The OSD
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:33:39PM +0200, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
> > > because that means they get an stable and well performing OS at zero
> > > cost for their embedded designes what makes these chips sell better.
> >
> > So what? Wasn't it idea of free Software to get it without paying f
I demand that Georg Acher may or may not have written...
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:33:39PM +0200, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
[snip]
> Until now, there's AFAIK no legal decision that you are not allowed to
> include binary only modules in the kernel. If it gets that far, we will put
> in user
Marco Schlüßler has sent me the attached patch that fixes a
buffer overflow in initializing VDR's character table.
Since I'll be away from home for another two weeks and this
might be a problem for others, too, I'm posting it here before
the next official developer version.
Klaus
diff -bur vdr-1.
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:33:21PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> That doesn't matter. It's still Linux-based and you still need to release the
> modified sources (I'd say enough to allow the building of a complete
> filesystem image for the device).
To make it clear: This whole argument is *ONLY*
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, JJussi wrote:
> So, is there "real" solution to this missing subtitles at recorded program
> problem?
The "vdr-1.5.2-spids" patch? It enables VDR's core to handle subtitling
pids internally and remuxes them into recordings as subtitles patch does
for backwards compatibility
On Saturday 30 June 2007 23:21:29 Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> I just upgraded to vdr 1.5.5 and now the colour buttons on the remote
> doesn't work anymore when there's no OSD. If I press the menu button
> first they work.
>
> Is there a new setting that can have this effect?
Hmm, my keymacros.conf for
I demand that Georg Acher may or may not have written...
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:33:21PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
>> That doesn't matter. It's still Linux-based and you still need to release
>> the modified sources (I'd say enough to allow the building of a complete
>> filesystem image for t
On 1 Jul 2007, at 15:54, Stefan Taferner wrote:
On Saturday 30 June 2007 23:21:29 Torgeir Veimo wrote:
I just upgraded to vdr 1.5.5 and now the colour buttons on the remote
doesn't work anymore when there's no OSD. If I press the menu button
first they work.
Is there a new setting that can ha
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 03:55:04PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Georg Acher may or may not have written...
>
> > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:33:21PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> >> That doesn't matter. It's still Linux-based and you still need to release
> >> the modified sources (I'd s
Sorry to jump in here... so does the vdr-1.5.2-spids patch mean that the
subtitles patch & plugin are no longer needed?
On 7/1/07, Rolf Ahrenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, JJussi wrote:
> So, is there "real" solution to this missing subtitles at recorded
program
> problem
Georg Acher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it's not. Free is free, you can't make differences between
> hardware vendors using Linux as a basis for their HW and SW vendors
> using Linux as an OS for their SW. And that's exactly the intention
> of your wording ("zero cost").
strange interpretat
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:47:18PM +0200, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
> or better or whatever. cool, no problem. what? you signed a NDA that
> does not allow you distribute the os in the first place? your bad.
Once again, and now in capitals.
IT'S ONLY THE HDMI DRIVER. THE REST OF THE KERNEL IS
On 01.07.2007 19:40, Georg Acher wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:47:18PM +0200, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
>
> > or better or whatever. cool, no problem. what? you signed a NDA that
> > does not allow you distribute the os in the first place? your bad.
>
> Once again, and now in capitals.
>
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:43:04PM +0200, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> If only the hardware vendors where as "united" as the movie-industry.
HDCP was invented by Intel, Silicon Image holds a lot of patents on DVI and
HDMI. As long as they can sell chips and licenses, they don't care about th
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Andrew Herron wrote:
> Sorry to jump in here... so does the vdr-1.5.2-spids patch mean that the
> subtitles patch & plugin are no longer needed?
No, the subtitles patch and plugin are still needed for viewing the
subtitles (both recordings and live tv), But I know that there
I demand that Georg Acher may or may not have written...
[snip]
> And quite frankly, the "dumb" consumer doesn't care about HDCP and its
> implications. Compared to DRM on music, HDCP is invisible to him, he has no
> visible disadvantage.
That's as may be... however, it does seem to be ignoring t
Georg Acher wrote:
> And quite frankly, the "dumb" consumer doesn't care about HDCP and its
> implications. Compared to DRM on music, HDCP is invisible to him, he has no
> visible disadvantage. So all the boycott stuff is for freaks only. The
> consumer buys a display with HDMI and it just works (
On 01.07.2007 21:10, Georg Acher wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:43:04PM +0200, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
> > If only the hardware vendors where as "united" as the movie-industry.
>
> HDCP was invented by Intel, Silicon Image holds a lot of patents on DVI and
> HDMI. As long as they c
ok. Thanks for clarifying that.
On 7/1/07, Rolf Ahrenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Andrew Herron wrote:
> Sorry to jump in here... so does the vdr-1.5.2-spids patch mean that the
> subtitles patch & plugin are no longer needed?
No, the subtitles patch and plugin are stil
Simon schrieb:
>Georg Acher wrote:
>
>
>
>>And quite frankly, the "dumb" consumer doesn't care about HDCP and its
>>implications. Compared to DRM on music, HDCP is invisible to him, he has no
>>visible disadvantage. So all the boycott stuff is for freaks only. The
>>consumer buys a display with
27 matches
Mail list logo
