Re: [vdr] OSD layout

2007-04-20 Thread Simon Baxter
> Hi! > > Yes there are some VDR-Skin-Plugins around. For example mine at > http://andreas.vdr-developer.org/enigmang > > What output device do you use? > You should be aware that e.g. Full-Featured DVB-S cards have limited OSD > capabilities (~90kb). So hires hi-color OSD will be a problem here.

Re: [vdr] Xineliboutput: can achieve similar to softdevice's mgatv option?

2007-04-20 Thread Alasdair Campbell
On 20/04/07, Markus Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you have the softdevice source code laying arround, you can have a look in that, especially 'video-dfb.c'. Search for 'setupStore->useMGAtv'. There are some if-constructs in there using this variable where some DirectFB settings (and mayb

Re: [vdr] Xineliboutput: can achieve similar to softdevice's mgatv option?

2007-04-20 Thread Alasdair Campbell
On 20/04/07, Markus Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 15:06:54 schrieb Alasdair Campbell: > config_xineliboutput > > # field parity > # { none top bottom }, default: 0 > #video.device.directfb_field_parity:none That's funny, my config_xineliboutput doesn't have

Re: [vdr] Xineliboutput: can achieve similar to softdevice's mgatv option?

2007-04-20 Thread Markus Schuster
On Friday 20 April 2007 20:50:16 Alasdair Campbell wrote: > My experiences with a 16:9 TV are different but theres some issues > with scaling & OSD that I would like to fix.. Maybe it's just a config-problem, at least it's a bit non-intuitive :) > I noticed that any scaling of the OSD results in

Re: [vdr] Xineliboutput: can achieve similar to softdevice's mgatv option?

2007-04-20 Thread Tony Houghton
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alasdair Campbell wrote: > On 20/04/07, Markus Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >BUT I have to admit that xineliboutput uses only half of the CPU power of > >softdevice, so it's video decoder has to be more efficient... Odd, because xine also uses ffmpeg. Perhaps it

Re: [vdr] NIT handling change in 1.4.3-4

2007-04-20 Thread Anssi Hannula
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > Anssi Hannula wrote: >> NIT handling was changed in 1.4.3-4 by adding an additional check if >> we're actually receiving this transponder. See the current code: >> >>> for (cChannel *Channel = Channels.First(); Channel; >>> Channel = Channels.Next(Channe

[vdr] [PATCH] re-use devices in transfer mode

2007-04-20 Thread Anssi Hannula
Hi! Consider the scenario: - 2 devices, 1 used in transfer mode on transponder A - a new recording / streamdev session starts on transponder A Now, IMO the correct thing to do is start the new receiver in the transfer-moded device, so that the second device is left free. However, the usual "use-

Re: [vdr] Xineliboutput: can achieve similar to softdevice's mgatv option?

2007-04-20 Thread Petri Hintukainen
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 19:21 +0100, Alasdair Campbell wrote: > > I'll have a look at the softdevice src this weekend & compare with > xineliboutput. Better to compare with xine-lib (src/video_out/video_out_directfb.c), as there's not even single line of directfb code in xineliboutput :) Xine-lib D

Re: [vdr] Xineliboutput: can achieve similar to softdevice's mgatv option?

2007-04-20 Thread Petri Hintukainen
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 03:27 +0200, Markus Schuster wrote: > With Bloomberg (German news/stock channel) I see a very odd behavior: To have > to video itself fullscreen, I have to enable local frontend scaling but then > the OSD is renderd much too big. So I have to enable OSD resizing/downscaling