On 18/04/07, Markus Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can vdr-xineliboutput utilize the excellent interlaced output of a
> Matrox G450 with VGA>SCART cable?
I'm asking myself the same question. I've played arround with xineliboutput
and softdevice the last days and came across the same issue
On 19 Apr 2007, at 09:41, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
In the original post I was just wondering if xineliboutput has been
written with the matrox specific instructions that softdevice's "-vo
dfb:mgatv" uses. As I don't understand the difference between "-vo
dfb:" & "-vo dfb:mgatv" I can't really
On 19 Apr 2007, at 09:55, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
In the original post I was just wondering if xineliboutput has been
written with the matrox specific instructions that softdevice's "-vo
dfb:mgatv" uses. As I don't understand the difference between "-vo
dfb:" & "-vo dfb:mgatv" I can't really say
On 19/04/07, Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 19 Apr 2007, at 09:41, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
>
> In the original post I was just wondering if xineliboutput has been
> written with the matrox specific instructions that softdevice's "-vo
> dfb:mgatv" uses. As I don't understand the di
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 12:53 +0100, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
>
> Using df_xine -a 5:4 -l 0 -s -f top 001.vdr
> I get perfect output! This is what Markus and I are seeing for a few
> seconds before the field sync gets screwed
>
> With df_xine -a 5:4 -l 0 -s -f bottom 001.vdr
> The output is constant
Sorry for replying to myself, but in the meantime, while waiting for
xineliboutput to work again, anyone reading know if I can use df_xine
for the video display, while retaining xineliboutput as the lirc
transport to my headless server running vdr-xineliboutput.
** I know there has been a tremend
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 13:54 +0100, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
> Sorry for replying to myself, but in the meantime, while waiting for
> xineliboutput to work again, anyone reading know if I can use df_xine
> for the video display, while retaining xineliboutput as the lirc
> transport to my headless se
On 19/04/07, Petri Hintukainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 12:53 +0100, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
>
> Using df_xine -a 5:4 -l 0 -s -f top 001.vdr
> I get perfect output! This is what Markus and I are seeing for a few
> seconds before the field sync gets screwed
>
> With df_xin
ignore that, I was being an idiot, set to 'top' now.
--
A l a s d a i r C a m p b e l l
r a g a w u @ g m a i l . c o m
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 10:41:01 schrieb Alasdair Campbell:
> If you make any progress please let me know!
I'll do! But I hope we both get a pointer in the correct direction here!
> What sort of hardware do you have?
Here it's an "old" P4 with 2.0 GHz. It's at 40-50% with softdevice, so m
Has anyone done any work (or written a plugin) to update the standard OSD?
I've not done this yet, but see you can change font size and colours using
themes, but I was thinking more than this.
I've now replaced my TV with a big high-res flat screen that could fit way
more text etc on the screen.
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 15:06:54 schrieb Alasdair Campbell:
> config_xineliboutput
>
> # field parity
> # { none top bottom }, default: 0
> #video.device.directfb_field_parity:none
That's funny, my config_xineliboutput doesn't have this config option per
default...
But I can insert it and
Hi!
Yes there are some VDR-Skin-Plugins around. For example mine at
http://andreas.vdr-developer.org/enigmang
What output device do you use?
You should be aware that e.g. Full-Featured DVB-S cards have limited OSD
capabilities (~90kb). So hires hi-color OSD will be a problem here.
Regards,
And
13 matches
Mail list logo
