Looking for dual tuner cards and found out that Fusion has a couple of
these. Anybody know if they are supported by linux? Or if they will be?
http://www.fusionhdtv.co.kr/ENG/Products/DualDigital.aspx
\\Kartsa
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
htt
Hi,
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 19:46, Harald Milz wrote:
> Andreas Mair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What language/locale do you use in VDRAdmin-AM?
> > Do you use any VDR patch, that changes its character encoding?
>
> I'm using the UTF-8 patch (because I'm using Russian and German EPGs),
> and
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> Every two and a half minute, my syslog gets an entry like:
>
> Jan 3 06:04:40 htpc kernel: cx88[1]/2: cx8802_timeout
> Jan 3 06:04:49 htpc vdr: [2369] frontend 1 timed out while tuning to
> channel 9, tp 578
>
> About 30 seconds before i get this entry, thee's a vdr threa
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:30:01 +0200
Kartsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking for dual tuner cards and found out that Fusion has a couple
> of these. Anybody know if they are supported by linux? Or if they
> will be?
>
> http://www.fusionhdtv.co.kr/ENG/Products/DualDigital.aspx
>
> \\Kartsa
>
On 3 Jan 2007, at 09:58, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
It would help if you could find out which particular thread is using
that CPU percentage. You can do
ps -T u -C vdr
Hmm, it looks like the thread 5748 (tuner on device 2 thread started).
Jan 3 11:37:29 htpc vdr: [5741] loading /video/vdr
> On 3 Jan 2007, at 09:58, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>
>>
>> It would help if you could find out which particular thread is using
>> that CPU percentage. You can do
>>
>> ps -T u -C vdr
>
> Hmm, it looks like the thread 5748 (tuner on device 2 thread started).
Looks more like thread 5767 to me,
On 3 Jan 2007, at 11:59, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
*** thread 5767 is eating most of the CPU time.
Unfortunately this one isn't listed in your log file excerpt.
No that's the softdevice output thread. It uses about 70% which is
expected with this particular setup and gfx card.
--
Torgeir
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
>
> On 3 Jan 2007, at 11:59, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>
>>
>> *** thread 5767 is eating most of the CPU time.
>> Unfortunately this one isn't listed in your log file excerpt.
>
> No that's the softdevice output thread. It uses about 70% which is
> expected with this particul
Hi Klaus,
On Mi, Jan 03, 2007 at 01:22:14 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Well, the tuner thread doesn't really do that much that might
> eat such a lot of CPU time, one would think.
>
> Maybe you can add some debug output in cDvbTuner::Action() and
> cDvbTuner::SetFrontend() to find out what
Halim Sahin wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
>
> On Mi, Jan 03, 2007 at 01:22:14 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> Well, the tuner thread doesn't really do that much that might
>> eat such a lot of CPU time, one would think.
>>
>> Maybe you can add some debug output in cDvbTuner::Action() and
>> cDvbTuner::
On 3 Jan 2007, at 15:25, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Halim Sahin wrote:
Hi Klaus,
On Mi, Jan 03, 2007 at 01:22:14 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Well, the tuner thread doesn't really do that much that might
eat such a lot of CPU time, one would think.
Maybe you can add some debug output in c
DOm kirjoitti:
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:30:01 +0200
Kartsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking for dual tuner cards and found out that Fusion has a couple
of these. Anybody know if they are supported by linux? Or if they
will be?
http://www.fusionhdtv.co.kr/ENG/Products/DualDigital.aspx
\\Kar
Hi,
On Mi, Jan 03, 2007 at 04:25:57 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Can you identify a particular VDR thread that consumes those
> 20% more CPU time?
>
Thats very dificult.
After observing this a time here is the output of
ps -T u -C vdr
USER PID SPID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STA
Halim Sahin wrote:
> Hi,
> On Mi, Jan 03, 2007 at 04:25:57 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> Can you identify a particular VDR thread that consumes those
>> 20% more CPU time?
>>
>
> Thats very dificult.
> After observing this a time here is the output of
> ps -T u -C vdr
>
> USER PID SPI
Hallo Klaus,
On Mi, Jan 03, 2007 at 06:34:47 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger
wrote:
> Halim Sahin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Mi, Jan 03, 2007 at 04:25:57 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> >> Can you identify a particular VDR thread that consumes those
> >> 20% more CPU time?
> >>
> >
> > Thats very dificult.
On Saturday 30 December 2006 19:53, Richard Scobie wrote:
> Timothy D. Lenz wrote:
> > Too bad it only has 1 expansion slot. That means only 1 tunner board.
> > I wouldn't even concider anything with less then 2-3 slots.
>
> It does have 4 x USB 2.0 which seems to be becoming popular for tuners
> n
Laz kirjoitti:
Maybe this is down to a buggy USB chip on the motherboard or maybe I'm
just unlucky and for some reason my two USB devices won't play happily
together (on their own, they can work seamlessly for weeks!), or maybe
it's down to a firmware bug or something. I also have a Nova-T 500
On 3 Jan 2007, at 20:45, Kartsa wrote:
Now that this came up. I was wondering in my earlier post today
about twin tuner cards and if I understood correctly Nova-T 500 is
such a card. And if I again understood correctly it works with
linux and VDR?
Some people including me are experienc
>>
> Fusion card has a mpeg4 decoder included.
Are you sure it has hardware decoder support for mpeg4, I could not find
that mentioned from that site.
Could that also offer the hardware support for divx...
Mika
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
