On Friday 01 December 2006 03:04, Oliver Endriss wrote:
> Carsten Koch wrote:
>
> Has anyone been able to identify the differences in the MPEG data if
> (a) mplayer
> (b) vdr
> play the sample stream?
>
My understanding of playback via mplayer is, that mplayer uses its included
synchronization log
Hello,
On Fr, Dez 01, 2006 at 10:46:15 +0100, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> On Friday 01 December 2006 03:04, Oliver Endriss wrote:
> > Carsten Koch wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone been able to identify the differences in the MPEG data if
> > (a) mplayer
> > (b) vdr
> > play the sample stream?
> >
> My un
Hi,
the new release is ready for download at http://andreas.vdr-developer.org/en
Have fun!
Andreas
2006-12-01: 3.5.1
- Added: Italian translation (Submitted by Gringo).
- Bugfixes.
2006-11-24: 3.5.1beta
- Changed: Handling of critical/colliding timers on encrypted channels in
timer_list (Reque
On Friday 01 December 2006 10:59, Halim Sahin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fr, Dez 01, 2006 at 10:46:15 +0100, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> > On Friday 01 December 2006 03:04, Oliver Endriss wrote:
> > > Carsten Koch wrote:
> > >
> > > Has anyone been able to identify the differences in the MPEG data if
hi,
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> Ack. For playback of vdr-recordings you are right. I meant it can be
> eventually transcoded (playback of non mpeg2-files).
OK, but the question is:
why can mplayer playback a vdr-recording without a/v sync problems
with a minimal load of almos
Udo Richter wrote:
Jörg Wendel wrote:
a question about the 'new' vdr shutdown handling implemented a few
versions ago.
[..]
But why vdr call this so often, isn't it only required if the vdr is
going to shutdown?
Even without the log message, at first view it looks like unnecessary
load?
VD
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
For VDR, the two if's in the inactivity shutdown should be swappable
with no serious side effects, see attached diff. All the calls do
noting important, except the cCutter::Active() call, and this one is
called often enough in other situations. But even with this patch,
Udo Richter wrote:
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
For VDR, the two if's in the inactivity shutdown should be swappable
with no serious side effects, see attached diff. All the calls do
noting important, except the cCutter::Active() call, and this one is
called often enough in other situations. But e
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Are you sure?
ACTIVITYTIMEOUT is 60 seconds, so wouldn't your change just
avoid the calls until 60 seconds after the last user activity?
Hmm, you're right. Its not a test on Setup.MinUserInactivity * 60. My
patch would just avoid these calls the usual 60 seconds after
