In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jaakko Kyro wrote:
> On Thursday 02 November 2006 21:44, Tony Houghton wrote:
>
> > Another good reason to use xineliboutput instead of softdevice is that
> > xine is much better at A/V sync than softdevice IME.
>
> I got interested in this and tried things out. Neither x
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:18, Tony Houghton wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jaakko Kyro wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 November 2006 21:44, Tony Houghton wrote:
> > > Another good reason to use xineliboutput instead of softdevice is that
> > > xine is much better at A/V sync than softdevice IME.
Hi,
i have now got the xine plugin running with df_xine (thx for that advice).
I had no problem with installing and need no parameters for df_xine.
Someone send me few xine-lib patches for to get xineliboutput plugin working
with dfb/tvout. I didn´t test that yet.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht---
Hi
Is possibile to grab image into a file from a remote machines?
there is a way to insert the stream generate with a svdrpsend.pl command
like this:
./svdrpsend.pl -d 192.168.0.2 grab - 10
in a valid jpeg or other graphical format file?
thank's
bye
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Is possibile to grab image into a file from a remote machines?
there is a way to insert the stream generate with a svdrpsend.pl command
like this:
./svdrpsend.pl -d 192.168.0.2 grab - 10
in a valid jpeg or other graphical format file?
svdrpsend.pl -d 'grab -'
Jaakko Kyro wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:18, Tony Houghton wrote:
>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jaakko Kyro wrote:
[..]
>> This is how I run it:
>>
>> df_xine -a 5:4 -l 0 -s -f top vdr:/tmp/vdr-xine/stream#demux:mpeg_pes
>
> The problem is that the /tmp/vdr-xine/stream doesn't exist here
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:13:22PM +0200, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Udo Richter wrote:
> >VDR User wrote:
> >>Klaus, any particular reason you're not releasing the TODO list?
> >
> >Probably to keep expectations down. If feature X is on the todo list,
> >then it might be implemented next week. Or
