Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-26 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
Anssi Hannula wrote: Anssi Hannula wrote: Klaus Schmidinger wrote: In this particular case I guess the recording really shouldn't start on the primary card, because the osdteletext plugin isn't a "real" recording process. So how shall we distinguish between cReceivers that do actual recordings

Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-26 Thread Anssi Hannula
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > Anssi Hannula wrote: >> Anssi Hannula wrote: >>> Klaus Schmidinger wrote: In this particular case I guess the recording really shouldn't start on the primary card, because the osdteletext plugin isn't a "real" recording process. So how shall we di

Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-26 Thread Anssi Hannula
Anssi Hannula wrote: > Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> Anssi Hannula wrote: >>> >>> diff -Nurp -x '*~' vdr-1.4.1-5/device.c vdr-1.4.1-5-mod/device.c >>> --- vdr-1.4.1-5/device.c2006-08-20 21:59:20.0 +0300 >>> +++ vdr-1.4.1-5-mod/device.c2006-08-23 18:41:26.0 +0300 >>> @@ -292,7

Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-26 Thread Udo Richter
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: So how shall we distinguish between cReceivers that do actual recordings and such that just receive, e.g., teletext data? Or those that receive a radio channel for streaming it to a remote client? Where's the limit? Is there a way to predict whether receiving a channel

Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-26 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
Udo Richter wrote: Klaus Schmidinger wrote: So how shall we distinguish between cReceivers that do actual recordings and such that just receive, e.g., teletext data? Or those that receive a radio channel for streaming it to a remote client? Where's the limit? Is there a way to predict whether

Re: [vdr] anyone using Technotrend Premium S2300 (Rev 2.3) "modded"

2006-08-26 Thread Seppo Ingalsuo
Simon Baxter wrote: Incidentally, is anyone out there using vdr-xine with HDTV? What kind of PC/hardware are you using? Any comments on quality etc?? Some DVB-S & MPEG-2 1080i demo channels still run on Sirius 5.0E. Works quite well with xine xxmc and 720p DVI/HDMI output to a LCD TV. The

Re: [vdr] anyone using Technotrend Premium S2300 (Rev 2.3) "modded"

2006-08-26 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
Seppo Ingalsuo wrote: ... I wish Klaus would upgrade some day to DVB-S2 and soft HDTV decoding :^) DVB-S2: sure, once there are DVB-S2 cards with hardware MPEG-4 decoding. Software HDTV decoding: I don't think so - that's what specialized and low power hardware chips are there for ;-) Klaus

Re: [vdr] Re: VDR prefers my CI DVB device for recordings and blocks it unnecessarily

2006-08-26 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
Anssi Hannula wrote: ... Attached is a patch which has this approach. So after *this* patch the above quoted scenario would continue like this instead: - recording is made via budget card (same behaviour as VDR 1.4.1) if AvoidPrimaryDevice is set - recording is made via FF card (leaving budget f

[vdr] Re: [linux-dvb] Mythtv with NEXUS-S only

2006-08-26 Thread Lauri Tischler
Gavin Hamill wrote: On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:37:35 +0300 Lauri Tischler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was wondering is it possible to have Mythtv running with NEXUS-S FF card only, using it for capture _and_ tv-out MythTV site seems to be centered around PVR-card. I don't believe so - that's wha

[vdr] Softdevice and nvidia overlays, slightly updated

2006-08-26 Thread CR
Stefan & everyone else , This weekend I spent time and completely un-installed my Xorg, and compiled modular Xorg 7.1 from sources. I also fetched vdr 1.4.1, and softdevice 0.2.3a, dvd-cvs and compiled them, no other plug-ins, ZERO patches to vdr or softdevice. I setup Xorg to use the "nv" drive