Jouni Karvo kirjoitti:
>
> So it seems the syscall numbers have changed at some point. I am afraid
> if the libc is now broken due to this. This has not happened to me
> before, so I don't actually know what would be the good thing to do.
> But forcing the syscall number to 178 does not actually f
hi,
Reinhard Nissl kirjoitti:
> Please report the logged error message.
>
Actually, your patch immediately segfaulted.
But I can see some problem: The include files from the distro tell me:
k...@vdr:/usr/include$ grep __NR_gettid */*
asm/unistd_32.h:#define __NR_gettid224
asm/unistd
Hi,
Am 27.01.2010 06:26, schrieb Jouni Karvo:
> A quick google did not tell me how to enable thread numbers in the log.
> Is it a specific library package to be installed or is it some certain
> kernel option?
Edit VDR's thread.c and replace method cThread::ThreadId() with
the below version:
t
hi,
Reinhard Nissl kirjoitti:
>
> This doesn't look like a vdr-xine issue.
>
>
Indeed not.
It just occurred to me that even though I had not started other plugins,
there was the yaepghd patch included. I removed that, and it seems now
the segmentation fault is gone. (for a few minutes at l
Hi,
Am 26.01.2010 19:18, schrieb Jouni Karvo:
> I included logs, please let me know what to try next.
Both of your so far posted logs show this scenario:
> Jan 26 19:54:55 vdr vdr: [-1] buffer usage: 70% (tid=-1)
> Jan 26 19:54:55 vdr vdr: [-1] buffer usage: 80% (tid=-1)
> Jan 26 19:54:55 vdr v
... and here the backtrace without -O2, if it helps more...
#0 0x004717be in cHashObject::Object (this=0x41) at tools.h:525
525 cListObject *Object(void) { return object; }
(gdb) bt
#0 0x004717be in cHashObject::Object (this=0x41) at tools.h:525
#1 0x00470153 in cChannels:
Jouni Karvo kirjoitti:
> Jouni Karvo kirjoitti:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> I just turned to 64bit, and it seems vdr dumps core there...
>>
>> compiled with g++-4.3
>>
>>
>>
> answering to myself. Compiling with g++-4.1 removes the segmentation fault.
>
But it does not. It does segfault, and in
Jouni Karvo kirjoitti:
> hi,
>
> I just turned to 64bit, and it seems vdr dumps core there...
>
> compiled with g++-4.3
>
>
answering to myself. Compiling with g++-4.1 removes the segmentation fault.
I don't know whether this is related, but g++-4.3 warns in many places
about expressions with
