Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> So what is the problem?
I want to use a TV and I would like to have a OSD. I like the OSD of
VDR, but there is only one. I would like to have one VDR-Server and two
or more Clients which can use OSD, program timer and view recordings. I
still not found a pos
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Oliver Joa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Would this approach allow easier implementation of a real client-server
>>> solution for VDR or would VDR still need severe changes in order to
>>> allow this?
>>
>> Has not much to do with this. The limitation for a client-
Hi,
Udo Richter wrote:
> Pasi Juppo wrote:
>> Would this approach allow easier implementation of a real client-server
>> solution for VDR or would VDR still need severe changes in order to
>> allow this?
>
> Has not much to do with this. The limitation for a client-server
> solution is that VDR
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> It's not like I'm generally against making dvbdevice.c a plugin, but
> if it's needed in most cases, anyway, where's the point?
Howabout implementing a command line switch to disable the integrated
DVB device support. The basic DVB support would be
Pasi Juppo wrote:
> Would this approach allow easier implementation of a real client-server
> solution for VDR or would VDR still need severe changes in order to
> allow this?
Has not much to do with this. The limitation for a client-server
solution is that VDR has exact ONE display front end, ON
Would this approach allow easier implementation of a real client-server
solution for VDR or would VDR still need severe changes in order to
allow this?
Br,
Pasi
VDR User wrote:
> It sounds like there are some really strong points in favor of using a
> plugin instead. It would be great to hear m
It sounds like there are some really strong points in favor of using a
plugin instead. It would be great to hear more input on this! I
don't see any real immediate drawbacks to switching over, are there
any?
Cheers
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Well, I like the idea of taking the plain VDR and a FF DVB card
> and have it run "out of the box", without having to fiddle around
> with any plugins ;-)
This is not really a good point any more, since at least latest
development 1.7.x builds wont work without a custom
On 26.10.2008 10:00, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
> "VDR User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The idea of adding the DVB support in form of plugins instead of
>> including it in the core code? Before I left on vacation there was
>> some talk about how this is a better solution these days but not
"VDR User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea of adding the DVB support in form of plugins instead of
> including it in the core code? Before I left on vacation there was
> some talk about how this is a better solution these days but not sure
> if anything ever came out of that...?
i brought
10 matches
Mail list logo
