Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

> There is somewhere repo of developer, FernetMenta, but I think those > source should perfectly fit XBMC plugin I've updated the plugin: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-vdr-dvb/vdr-plugin-vnsiserver.git;a=summary But I this is still considered unstable, so right now this is no candida

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On Wednesday, 20 March 2013, Marx wrote: > On 20.03.2013 00:01, Tobi wrote: > >> Can you point me to the upstream sources? Is there an official version of >> the VNSI plugin for Frodo? >> > Based on > http://forum.xbmc.org/**showthread.php?tid=139675

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 20.03.2013 00:01, Tobi wrote: Can you point me to the upstream sources? Is there an official version of the VNSI plugin for Frodo? Based on http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=139675 here it is: https://github.com/opdenkamp/xbmc-pvr-addons/tree/master/addons/pvr.vdr.vnsi There is somewhe

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 19.03.2013 15:13, Marx wrote: > what about: > - vdr-plugin-vnsiserver - seems outdated: 0.0.1~svn20100428+frodo-1. would > be nice to have version corresponding with stable frodo VNSI plugin Can you point me to the upstream sources? Is there an official version of the VNSI plugin for Frodo? >

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 19.03.2013 10:44, Tobi wrote: On 19.03.2013 08:51, Marx wrote: what about softhddevice? As i saw vdr running script in Debian doesn't play well with softhddevice (restart vdr while softhddevice is initializing) Marx I've already packaged softhddevice, but I need to test it before I decide

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 19.03.2013 08:51, Marx wrote: > what about softhddevice? As i saw vdr running script in Debian doesn't > play well with softhddevice (restart vdr while softhddevice is initializing) > Marx I've already packaged softhddevice, but I need to test it before I decide to upload it to Debian. http:/

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 18.03.2013 20:11, Tobi wrote: On 18.03.2013 15:43, Dominic Evans wrote: I noticed that http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-vdr-dvb/vdr-plugin-markad.git is actively maintained, but no deb has been uploaded to debian archive. Do you plan to upload one whenever vdr 1.7.41 / vdr 2.0.0 gets

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 18.03.2013 15:43, Dominic Evans wrote: > I noticed that > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-vdr-dvb/vdr-plugin-markad.git > is actively maintained, but no deb has been uploaded to debian > archive. Do you plan to upload one whenever vdr 1.7.41 / vdr 2.0.0 > gets uploaded to unstable/expe

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 8 May 2012 19:29, Tobi wrote: > On 08.05.2012 18:34, Marx wrote >> I didn't know and that's why his repository isn't updated. In fact I use >> lately Debian's version (and I was quite suprised that so new version is >> available in Debian). Hovewer number of available plugins in Debian is >> pr

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

Am 12.05.2012 17:32, schrieb VDR User: On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:47 AM, abang wrote: I just noticed, that the missing plugins for squeeze are already in Tobi's VDR repository. Sorry for the confusion! But I can't upgrade: The following packages have unmet dependencies: vdr-plugin-chanorg: D

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:47 AM, abang wrote: > I just noticed, that the missing plugins for squeeze are already in Tobi's > VDR repository. Sorry for the confusion! > > But I can't upgrade: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: >  vdr-plugin-chanorg: Depends: vdr-abi-1.7.23-multipat

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

Hi, I just noticed, that the missing plugins for squeeze are already in Tobi's VDR repository. Sorry for the confusion! But I can't upgrade: The following packages have unmet dependencies: vdr-plugin-chanorg: Depends: vdr-abi-1.7.23-multipatch which is a virtual package. vdr-plugin-burn:

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

Hello Tobias, Make some suggestions what Plugins you would like to see in official Debian! I'm going to upload markad to Debian soon. And my e-tobi.net-repository has been updated this morning. But there are some old plugins with no upstream activity that I haven't migrated to VDR 1.7.27 yet. I

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Dominic Evans wrote: > I did fix a couple of memory leaks in my own local build of eepg, but I > still find issues with it killing off my tuners after extended use, so I'm > still not using it. Do you have any details about these memory leaks? Also, do they exist i

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On Wed, 09 May 2012 21:49:04 +0200 Tobi wrote: > On 09.05.2012 18:16, Tony Houghton wrote: > > > That sounds like a good idea. Tobias, would you be willing to add this > > patch if enabling it is made optional? > > Not if this can be done with a plugin as well. > > Where can I find the most re

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 09.05.2012 18:16, Tony Houghton wrote: That sounds like a good idea. Tobias, would you be willing to add this patch if enabling it is made optional? Not if this can be done with a plugin as well. Where can I find the most recent version of the patch? Tobias __

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 08.05.2012 21:18, VDR User wrote: If you haven't added it already, you should consider adding softhddevice. I'll take a look at this. Tobias ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On Wed, 09 May 2012 16:31:23 +0100 Dominic Evans wrote: > On 09/05/12 14:32, Tony Houghton wrote: > > On Wed, 09 May 2012 12:14:48 +0100 > > Dominic Evans wrote: [Problems with eepg] > >> Tbh, it would probably be better if someone coded it from scratch. > > > > Or rework the alternative patch

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 09/05/12 14:32, Tony Houghton wrote: On Wed, 09 May 2012 12:14:48 +0100 Dominic Evans wrote: On 09/05/12 00:54, Tony Houghton wrote: I'd like eepg to be packaged, but only if the memory leak can be fixed and it's made to work on Freeview HD. The Huffman tables and marker bytes at the star

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On Wed, 09 May 2012 12:14:48 +0100 Dominic Evans wrote: > On 09/05/12 00:54, Tony Houghton wrote: > > > I'd like eepg to be packaged, but only if the memory leak can be fixed > > and it's made to work on Freeview HD. The Huffman tables and marker > > bytes at the start of the strings are the same

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 09/05/12 00:54, Tony Houghton wrote: Make some suggestions what Plugins you would like to see in official Debian! I'm going to upload markad to Debian soon. I'd like eepg to be packaged, but only if the memory leak can be fixed and it's made to work on Freeview HD. The Huffman tables and mar

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 8.5.2012 21:29, Tobi wrote: Make some suggestions what Plugins you would like to see in official Debian! I'm going to upload markad to Debian soon. http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/plg-ttxtsubs Ttxtsubs would be nice. ___ vdr mailing li

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On Tue, 08 May 2012 20:29:13 +0200 Tobi wrote: > On 08.05.2012 18:34, Marx wrote > > > I didn't know and that's why his repository isn't updated. In fact I use > > lately Debian's version (and I was quite suprised that so new version is > > available in Debian). Hovewer number of available plugi

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Tobi wrote: > Make some suggestions what Plugins you would like to see in official Debian! > I'm going to upload markad to Debian soon. If you haven't added it already, you should consider adding softhddevice. People have wanted an alternative to the xinelib-based

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 08.05.2012 18:34, Marx wrote I didn't know and that's why his repository isn't updated. In fact I use lately Debian's version (and I was quite suprised that so new version is available in Debian). Hovewer number of available plugins in Debian is pretty low. Do you know if he plans to migrate

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Marx wrote: > I'm not as good in writing scripts as you :) Do you install VDR from > sources, or build debian packages? Scripting is really easy once you know it. If not, no worries, it's easy to learn too. :) When I first started with VDR, I installed it. Then I

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

I'm not as good in writing scripts as you :) Do you install VDR from sources, or build debian packages? I know it's not so hard to build everything manually and in fact I did it many times. Hovewer packages in yavdr or e-tobi repositories were easier to install, and it was sure they will work to

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

W dniu 2012-05-08 16:10, Pertti Kosunen pisze: On 8.5.2012 15:16, Marx wrote: This lead to alternative repositories. I know two valuable: e-tobi and yavdr. I was using e-tobi but it lately isn't updated to the newest VDR. http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=et...@debian.org http://package

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Marx wrote: > Hello > I use Debian for years and to keep it clean I'm trying to use all software > from packages. It generally works, hovewer I have problem with VDR, XBMC and > drivers. > Usually to have the newest driver I need to use some unstable version of VDR

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

On 8.5.2012 15:16, Marx wrote: This lead to alternative repositories. I know two valuable: e-tobi and yavdr. I was using e-tobi but it lately isn't updated to the newest VDR. http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=et...@debian.org http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/vdr.html Tobias Grimm is now

Re: [vdr] VDR form packages

Am 2012-05-08 14:16, schrieb Marx: Hello I use Debian for years and to keep it clean I'm trying to use all software from packages. It generally works, hovewer I have problem with VDR, XBMC and drivers. Usually to have the newest driver I need to use some unstable version of VDR with the newest po