I demand that gimli may or may not have written...
> have compile errors with gcc 4.4. The attached patch makes vdr 1.7.7
> compileable.
Why is that a follow-up, and not the start of a new thread?
--
| Darren Salt | linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Doon
| Debian GNU/Linux | or d
Sure, the patch is not the best solution. You are right, whats to ment
const should be const. In the first step it's more or less a speed fix :D
> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:40 +0200, gimli wrote:
> ...
>> have compile errors with gcc 4.4. The attached patch makes vdr 1.7.7
>> compileable.
>
> I won
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:40 +0200, gimli wrote:
...
> have compile errors with gcc 4.4. The attached patch makes vdr 1.7.7
> compileable.
I wonder if it would not be better to make as many things
as possible "const" rather than casting existing consts away.
I my code, I am trying to make everythi
Hi,
Attached is an updated patch, which also extends tools.h to return char *.
> Hi,
>
> have compile errors with gcc 4.4. The attached patch makes vdr 1.7.7
> compileable. What google told me, gcc 4.4 also affects 1.6.0.
>
> cu
>
> Edgar (gimli) Hucek
