Theunis Potgieter wrote:
> Sorry to make things complicated, but would it not satisfy everybody
> needs if you could bind to an ip address, which could be any one you
> specify? For example, I would prefer mine to be bind to my eth0's ip
> for internal lan clients to connect, but not accessible via
> I've attached a second patch. This patch changes VDR's svdrp port
> handling in the following way: If only the localhost item is found in
> svdrphosts.conf, then the port is attached to "INADDR_LOOPBACK", which
> makes it impossible to reach the port from outside. As soon as even one
> additional
Il 09/01/2010 18:10, Theunis Potgieter ha scritto:
> Sorry to make things complicated, but would it not satisfy everybody
> needs if you could bind to an ip address, which could be any one you
> specify? For example, I would prefer mine to be bind to my eth0's ip
> for internal lan clients to conne
Sorry to make things complicated, but would it not satisfy everybody
needs if you could bind to an ip address, which could be any one you
specify? For example, I would prefer mine to be bind to my eth0's ip
for internal lan clients to connect, but not accessible via ppp0 for
example.
So I guess wh
Hello,
I've attached a second patch. This patch changes VDR's svdrp port handling in
the following way: If only the localhost item is found in svdrphosts.conf, then
the port is attached to "INADDR_LOOPBACK", which makes it impossible to reach
the port from outside. As soon as even one additiona
2010/1/9 Manuel Reimer :
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:25:29 +0100
>> Von: Olaf Titz
>> An: vdr@linuxtv.org
>> Betreff: Re: [vdr] [Patch] Allow to limit SVDRP port to given IP
>
>> But how about this much simpler solution:
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:25:29 +0100
> Von: Olaf Titz
> An: vdr@linuxtv.org
> Betreff: Re: [vdr] [Patch] Allow to limit SVDRP port to given IP
> But how about this much simpler solution: if svdrphosts.conf is
> missing or empty, bind
On 09.01.2010 11:25, Olaf Titz wrote:
>> How about this: if svdrphosts.conf contains only one single IP number, then
>> open the port for only that IP number. Otherwise i needs to be opened
>> generally,
>
> This only works if the single line in svdrphosts.conf is 127.0.0.1.
>
> But how about th
> How about this: if svdrphosts.conf contains only one single IP number, then
> open the port for only that IP number. Otherwise i needs to be opened
> generally,
This only works if the single line in svdrphosts.conf is 127.0.0.1.
But how about this much simpler solution: if svdrphosts.conf is
m
Hello,
> How about this: if svdrphosts.conf contains only one single IP number,
> then
> open the port for only that IP number. Otherwise i needs to be opened
> generally,
> anyway.
You are absolutely right!
So if svdrphosts.conf only contains "127.0.0.1" (which is the default), then
the port w
Hi!
Klaus Schmidinger schrieb:
> How about this: if svdrphosts.conf contains only one single IP number, then
> open the port for only that IP number. Otherwise i needs to be opened
> generally,
> anyway.
AFAIK one can only bind an IP socket to a local address (usually
corresponding to a network
On 08.01.2010 16:56, Manuel Reimer wrote:
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:57:12 +0100
>> Von: Klaus Schmidinger
>> An: VDR Mailing List
>> Betreff: Re: [vdr] [Patch] Allow to limit SVDRP port to given IP
>
>> What about
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:57:12 +0100
> Von: Klaus Schmidinger
> An: VDR Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: [vdr] [Patch] Allow to limit SVDRP port to given IP
> What about svdrphosts.conf?
It just denies someone to access. The port is
On 08.01.2010 13:27, Manuel Reimer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the INSTALL file in the VDR source code says:
>
> WARNING: DUE TO THE OPEN SVDRP PORT THIS PROGRAM MAY CONSTITUTE A
> === POTENTIAL SECURITY HAZARD! IF YOU ARE NOT RUNNING VDR IN
> A CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT, YOU MAY WANT TO DISAB
14 matches
Mail list logo
