On 06.02.2010 17:13, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>
>> On 06.02.2010 12:27, Halim Sahin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Just my opinion about the problem:
>>> The fat filesystem has many limitations and I vote for dropping special
>>> support for it in VDR because if som
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 06.02.2010 12:27, Halim Sahin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Just my opinion about the problem:
> > The fat filesystem has many limitations and I vote for dropping special
> > support for it in VDR because if someone wants to use a windows system,
> > he/she can use ntfs which wor
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Halim Sahin wrote:
> Hi,
> Just my opinion about the problem:
> The fat filesystem has many limitations and I vote for dropping special
> support for it in VDR because if someone wants to use a windows system,
> he/she can use ntfs which works fine in current distri
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 06.02.2010 12:27, Halim Sahin wrote:
Hi,
Just my opinion about the problem:
The fat filesystem has many limitations and I vote for dropping special
support for it in VDR because if someone wants to use a windows system,
he/she can use ntfs which w
On 06.02.2010 12:27, Halim Sahin wrote:
> Hi,
> Just my opinion about the problem:
> The fat filesystem has many limitations and I vote for dropping special
> support for it in VDR because if someone wants to use a windows system,
> he/she can use ntfs which works fine in current distributions (ntf
Hi,
Just my opinion about the problem:
The fat filesystem has many limitations and I vote for dropping special
support for it in VDR because if someone wants to use a windows system,
he/she can use ntfs which works fine in current distributions (ntfs-3g).
Just my 2 Cents.
Halim
__
On 05.02.2010 23:43, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>
>> How about '.'? (w/o the single quotes).
>> That would result in /video/./name, which is the same
>> as /video/name.
>
> That was my initial idea too, but due to the VFAT conversion a '#2E'
> sub-directo
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
How about '.'? (w/o the single quotes).
That would result in /video/./name, which is the same
as /video/name.
That was my initial idea too, but due to the VFAT conversion a '#2E'
sub-directory will be made instead of the root directory. I'm using
On 04.02.2010 08:17, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>
>> Well, you can always position to the file name, pres "Right" and then
>> "Yellow" to delete the folder part of the name.
>
> Yes, but IMO that's not an easy way. :) I was thinking about a special
> root
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Well, you can always position to the file name, pres "Right" and then
"Yellow" to delete the folder part of the name.
Yes, but IMO that's not an easy way. :) I was thinking about a special
root directory entry for folders.conf.
BR,
--
rofa
_
On 03.02.2010 16:02, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the current folder setting feature for timers doesn't have easy way to
> reset the selected folder back to the root one - or I just missed it.
> I'd really like to see this little addition in the next vdr release.
Well, you can always positi
Hi,
the current folder setting feature for timers doesn't have easy way to
reset the selected folder back to the root one - or I just missed it.
I'd really like to see this little addition in the next vdr release.
BR,
--
rofa
___
vdr mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
