Re: [vdr] VDR 2.0

2009-03-16 Thread VDR User
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Peter Evertz wrote: > Magnus Hörlin schrieb: >> Hi. VDR 1.x was MPEG2-only and recorded in MPEG-PES. Now that it can do >> MPEG4 AVC/AAC, and records in MPEG-TS, isn't it time to rename it 2.0 after >> 1.7.5? >> /Magnus H >> > Brilliant Idea. That will boost the sa

Re: [vdr] VDR 2.0

2009-03-16 Thread gimli
ROTFL Peter Evertz schrieb: > Magnus Hörlin schrieb: >> Hi. VDR 1.x was MPEG2-only and recorded in MPEG-PES. Now that it can do >> MPEG4 AVC/AAC, and records in MPEG-TS, isn't it time to rename it 2.0 after >> 1.7.5? >> /Magnus H >> > Brilliant Idea. That will boost the sales numbers to the lim

Re: [vdr] VDR 2.0

2009-03-16 Thread Peter Evertz
Magnus Hörlin schrieb: > Hi. VDR 1.x was MPEG2-only and recorded in MPEG-PES. Now that it can do > MPEG4 AVC/AAC, and records in MPEG-TS, isn't it time to rename it 2.0 after > 1.7.5? > /Magnus H > Brilliant Idea. That will boost the sales numbers to the limits :) SCNR Peter > > > ___

[vdr] VDR 2.0

2009-03-16 Thread Magnus Hörlin
Hi. VDR 1.x was MPEG2-only and recorded in MPEG-PES. Now that it can do MPEG4 AVC/AAC, and records in MPEG-TS, isn't it time to rename it 2.0 after 1.7.5? /Magnus H ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vd