Re: [vdr] Transfer-Mode without remux

2008-02-10 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 02/10/08 18:39, Friedhelm Büscher wrote: > Klaus Schmidinger schrieb: >> On 02/02/08 16:27, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >>> In a crude attempt to run VDR's Transfer-Mode without using a cRemux >>> (and thus avoiding all the extra buffering and processing) I am >>> trying to send the payload of the

Re: [vdr] Transfer-Mode without remux

2008-02-10 Thread Friedhelm Büscher
Klaus Schmidinger schrieb: > On 02/02/08 16:27, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> In a crude attempt to run VDR's Transfer-Mode without using a cRemux >> (and thus avoiding all the extra buffering and processing) I am >> trying to send the payload of the TS packets directly to the device. >> >> The attac

Re: [vdr] Transfer-Mode without remux

2008-02-03 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 02/03/08 10:56, Martin Dauskardt wrote: > Hi Klaus, > > sending TS payload data directly to the device shouldn`t become a generally > method. Please be aware that there are other output devices which can`t > handle TS data. For example, the decoder of the PVR350 needs a multiplexed > Audio/V

Re: [vdr] Transfer-Mode without remux

2008-02-03 Thread Martin Dauskardt
Hi Klaus, sending TS payload data directly to the device shouldn`t become a generally method. Please be aware that there are other output devices which can`t handle TS data. For example, the decoder of the PVR350 needs a multiplexed Audio/Video PES. Greets, Martin

Re: [vdr] Transfer-Mode without remux

2008-02-02 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 02/02/08 18:01, VDR User wrote: > On Feb 2, 2008 8:14 AM, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 02/02/08 16:59, Reinhard Nissl wrote: >>> Have you never tried my syncearly patch? >> Sorry, but I never found the time to try it. >> >> By sending the TS payload data directly to the dev

Re: [vdr] Transfer-Mode without remux

2008-02-02 Thread VDR User
On Feb 2, 2008 8:14 AM, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 02/02/08 16:59, Reinhard Nissl wrote: > > Have you never tried my syncearly patch? > > Sorry, but I never found the time to try it. > > By sending the TS payload data directly to the device, audio appears almost > instantaneo

Re: [vdr] Transfer-Mode without remux

2008-02-02 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 02/02/08 16:59, Reinhard Nissl wrote: > Hi, > > Klaus Schmidinger schrieb: > >> Now it works - and Transfer-Mode never switched as fast as this :-) > > Have you never tried my syncearly patch? Sorry, but I never found the time to try it. By sending the TS payload data directly to the device

Re: [vdr] Transfer-Mode without remux

2008-02-02 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Klaus Schmidinger schrieb: > Now it works - and Transfer-Mode never switched as fast as this :-) Have you never tried my syncearly patch? Bye. -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org htt

Re: [vdr] Transfer-Mode without remux

2008-02-02 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 02/02/08 16:27, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > In a crude attempt to run VDR's Transfer-Mode without using a cRemux > (and thus avoiding all the extra buffering and processing) I am > trying to send the payload of the TS packets directly to the device. > > The attached patch implements cDevice::Pla

[vdr] Transfer-Mode without remux

2008-02-02 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
In a crude attempt to run VDR's Transfer-Mode without using a cRemux (and thus avoiding all the extra buffering and processing) I am trying to send the payload of the TS packets directly to the device. The attached patch implements cDevice::PlayTS() and handles video and audio packets with fixed P