Le jeudi 29 novembre 2007 à 17:05 +, Chris Jones a écrit :
> > Has anyone tried VGA out at 1600x1050 on a FullHD (Sony Bravia for
> > example)? If so what does it look like.
>
> I've used a PC connected to a 40" Bravia via DVI and it was pretty damn
> good. If you sat far enough away you coul
Hi
Tony Grant wrote:
> Has anyone tried VGA out at 1600x1050 on a FullHD (Sony Bravia for
> example)? If so what does it look like.
I've used a PC connected to a 40" Bravia via DVI and it was pretty damn
good. If you sat far enough away you could use it comfortably as a
monitor. Up close and the
On Thursday, 22. Novemberta 2007 22:21:36 VDR User wrote:
> Just curious... Why did you buy a dvb card? Antennas work just fine
> and are less expensive.
Here at Finland.. We don't have any analog transmitions anymore.. We are full
digital.. ;-)
--
JJussi
___
VDR User wrote:
> Just curious... Why did you buy a dvb card? Antennas work just fine
> and are less expensive.
Everyone else was buying them
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
VDR User kirjoitti:
> On Nov 22, 2007 11:46 AM, Alasdair Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> At the point when my cards stop
>> receiving a signal I might start worrying about being 'left behind'.
>>
>
> Just curious... Why did you buy a dvb card? Antennas work just fine
> and are le
On Nov 22, 2007 11:46 AM, Alasdair Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the point when my cards stop
> receiving a signal I might start worrying about being 'left behind'.
Just curious... Why did you buy a dvb card? Antennas work just fine
and are less expensive.
___
Beside all that, I do believe VDR needs to integrate H264 & HD
recording, along with support built-in for multiple frontends. Hopefully
I can lend a hand with the coding (in about 6 years).
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cg
VDR User wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2007 7:30 AM, Füley István <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> To be clear: I did not say, that we don't need HD at all. I just said,
>> that normal TV stations should stay in SD, and only a couple of premium
>> (PPV, etc) channels should go HD. But the situation is more clea
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, VDR User wrote:
> Btw, do you still prefer music on cassette tape? ;) (just kidding)
No, I never liked casette tapes. But I prefer LPs instead of CDs...
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_
On Nov 22, 2007 7:30 AM, Füley István <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be clear: I did not say, that we don't need HD at all. I just said,
> that normal TV stations should stay in SD, and only a couple of premium
> (PPV, etc) channels should go HD. But the situation is more clear: not me
> is gonna
Tony Grant kirjoitti:
>
>>> You forgot to add the €20,000 building an extension to your house, if
>>> you don't want your living room to be dominated by a 42" diagonal piece
>>> of plastic.
>>>
>
> Lucky me my living room is huge!
>
You really do not need a huge living room for 42".
I'v
Lauri Tischler wrote:
> Alasdair Campbell wrote:
>> Lauri Tischler wrote:
>>> Not really, FullHD also means large, minimum 42", it is quite senseless
>>> to to watch good picture on a postcard, so you start at €1500
>> You forgot to add the €20,000 building an extension to your house, if
>> you d
Le jeudi 22 novembre 2007 à 17:41 +0200, Lauri Tischler a écrit :
> >>> But to buy a 1000+ Euro TV set? That's another reason for me to stay SD.
> >> Not really, FullHD also means large, minimum 42", it is quite senseless
> >> to to watch good picture on a postcard, so you start at €1500
Has any
Alasdair Campbell wrote:
> Lauri Tischler wrote:
>> Füley István wrote:
Oops, that's really not so good... one can't comment about HDTV with a
resolution which is not full HDTV : 1920x1080...
>>> Ok, this means that my setup is a low-end instead of being "average" as I
>>> stated before,
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Gregoire Favre wrote:
> First you could try it on a computer monitor : tremendous !!!
Yes, I did it once, about two years ago, on a 24" CRT monitor I tried
Euro1080, or something like this, it was DVB-S, MPEG2, but unfortunately
my CPU has not enough power to decode it flaw
Lauri Tischler wrote:
> Füley István wrote:
>>> Oops, that's really not so good... one can't comment about HDTV with a
>>> resolution which is not full HDTV : 1920x1080...
>> Ok, this means that my setup is a low-end instead of being "average" as I
>> stated before, therefore my considerations abo
Füley István wrote:
>> Oops, that's really not so good... one can't comment about HDTV with a
>> resolution which is not full HDTV : 1920x1080...
>
> Ok, this means that my setup is a low-end instead of being "average" as I
> stated before, therefore my considerations about HDTV was totally wrong
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 03:08:22PM +0200, Füley István wrote:
> Ok, this means that my setup is a low-end instead of being "average" as I
> stated before, therefore my considerations about HDTV was totally wrong.
AFAIK HDready are going to disapear...
> But to buy a 1000+ Euro TV set? That's an
> Oops, that's really not so good... one can't comment about HDTV with a
> resolution which is not full HDTV : 1920x1080...
Ok, this means that my setup is a low-end instead of being "average" as I
stated before, therefore my considerations about HDTV was totally wrong.
But to buy a 1000+ Euro T
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Füley István wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I followed the recent messages about the future of VDR with great interest
> .
> I would like to share my recent experiences about HDTV. As I consider
> myself to be open for "new technologies" like HDTV is now, I rec
Hello list,
I followed the recent messages about the future of VDR with great
interest .
I would like to share my recent experiences about HDTV. As I
consider myself
to be open for "new technologies" like HDTV is now, I recently
bought an HDTV receiver.
It doesn't matter who produced it, I th
21 matches
Mail list logo
