07
An: VDR Mailing List
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [vdr] Doubling my available VDR disk space without cost
or loss of convenience.
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:55:20 +0200, you wrote:
>On Thursday 14 September 2006 07:08, Emil Naepflein wrote:
>> That doesn't matter. Important ist th
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:55:20 +0200, you wrote:
>On Thursday 14 September 2006 07:08, Emil Naepflein wrote:
>> That doesn't matter. Important ist that I have instant access.
>
>Keeping it online has the drawback that all parts fail at once when your house
>gets hit by lightning/overvoltage...not s
On Thursday 14 September 2006 07:08, Emil Naepflein wrote:
> That doesn't matter. Important ist that I have instant access.
Keeping it online has the drawback that all parts fail at once when your house
gets hit by lightning/overvoltage...not sure how good USVs are at protecting
hardware.
_
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:31:56 +0200, you wrote:
>So Carsten, you talk about archiving. Then you should definitely go for h264
>coding, with constant quality.
>Why keep everything online? What is the aim of having terra bytes online? It
>costs a lot of energy.
I have a similar setup like Carsten (
[EMAIL PROTECTED](Norbert Goebel) 13.09.06 18:21
>Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>>
>> Not excatly.
>>
>> I would call it "semy-online"-storage.
>>
>> Normaly the HDDs are switched off.
>> But as they are connected to USB-Power-Switches they can be switched
>> on/off automatically by the compute
Norbert Goebel wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>>
>> Not excatly.
>>
>> I would call it "semy-online"-storage.
>>
>> Normaly the HDDs are switched off.
>> But as they are connected to USB-Power-Switches they can be switched
>> on/off automatically by the computer.(*)
>>
>
>
> Hi,
>
Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
Not excatly.
I would call it "semy-online"-storage.
Normaly the HDDs are switched off.
But as they are connected to USB-Power-Switches they can be switched
on/off automatically by the computer.(*)
Hi,
I just got interested when I read USB-Power-Switches and
[EMAIL PROTECTED](Carsten Koch) 12.09.06 20:22
>Guido Fiala wrote:
>...
>> Sounds like the core computer of the USS-Enterprise -
>> How many Terra-Quads are this? ;-)
>Actually, according to
>http://www.kasper-online.de/en/docs/startrek/ncc1701d.htm
>the Enterprise D has a mere 630.000 Kiloquad
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 20:22, Carsten Koch wrote:
> Guido Fiala wrote:
> ...
>
> > Sounds like the core computer of the USS-Enterprise -
> > How many Terra-Quads are this? ;-)
>
> Actually, according to
> http://www.kasper-online.de/en/docs/startrek/ncc1701d.htm
> the Enterprise D has a mere
Carsten Koch wrote:
> Neither is my VDR system even close to the largest one.
> I believe that Matthias Schniedermeier has so many disks
> in his house that the house no longer requires a separate
> heating system. ;-)
Not excatly.
I would call it "semy-online"-storage.
Normaly the HDDs are swi
Carsten Koch wrote:
> martin wrote:
> ...
>
>>go and get yourself a new hard disc :-)
>
>
> Well, that option is of course always available. ;-)
> Let's take a look at my vdr system:
>
> /video> df -hT
> FilesystemTypeSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda2 xfs147G 12G
space without cost or
loss of convenience.
Guido Fiala wrote:
...
> Sounds like the core computer of the USS-Enterprise - How many
> Terra-Quads are this? ;-)
Actually, according to
http://www.kasper-online.de/en/docs/startrek/ncc1701d.htm
the Enterprise D has a mere 630.000 Kiloquads
Carsten Koch wrote:
...
> Actually, according to
> http://www.kasper-online.de/en/docs/startrek/ncc1701d.htm
> the Enterprise D has a mere 630.000 Kiloquads.
Sorry, wrong link. I meant this one:
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/misc/artikel-computer.htm
__
Guido Fiala wrote:
...
> Sounds like the core computer of the USS-Enterprise -
> How many Terra-Quads are this? ;-)
Actually, according to
http://www.kasper-online.de/en/docs/startrek/ncc1701d.htm
the Enterprise D has a mere 630.000 Kiloquads.
But seriously: My VDR system started out in June 2000
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 19:07, Carsten Koch wrote:
> FilesystemTypeSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda2 xfs147G 12G 136G 8% /
> udev tmpfs253M 236K 252M 1% /dev
> /dev/hdb1 xfs149G 86G 64G 58% /vdr2
> /dev/hdc1 xfs149G 115G
martin wrote:
...
> go and get yourself a new hard disc :-)
Well, that option is of course always available. ;-)
Let's take a look at my vdr system:
/video> df -hT
FilesystemTypeSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 xfs147G 12G 136G 8% /
udev tmpfs253M 236
o within short time you have high defition
TV with high compression.
Cheers,
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Carsten Koch
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. September 2006 17:38
An: VDR Mailing List
Betreff: [vdr] Doubling my available VD
Most of my VDR movies are between 2 and 3 GB in size.
I assume that there would be no noticeable loss of
quality, if I would convert them to DivX movies of
about half the size, maybe also removing any unwanted
sound tracks.
This could even be done automatically by a background
process.
However, t
18 matches
Mail list logo
