Re: [vdr] [feature request] recording length computation and storage

2011-08-23 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:45:18 +0200 Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 19.08.2011 23:56, Steffen Barszus wrote: > > It's slow since it needs to iterate through all recordings > > and check file size of the index file (thats what i understand from > > Klaus comment), so divide that by number of frames of

Re: [vdr] [feature request] recording length computation and storage

2011-08-21 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 19.08.2011 23:56, Steffen Barszus wrote: On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:18:03 +0200 Udo Richter wrote: Am 19.08.2011 15:30, schrieb Steffen Barszus: On 08/19/11 11:46, Steffen Barszus wrote: i would like to request, that vdr is storing the length of a recording and make it accessible to the plug-

Re: [vdr] [feature request] recording length computation and storage

2011-08-19 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:18:03 +0200 Udo Richter wrote: > Am 19.08.2011 15:30, schrieb Steffen Barszus: > On 08/19/11 11:46, Steffen Barszus wrote: > > i would like to request, that > > vdr is storing the length of a recording and make it accessible > > to the plug-ins. > > > > Whe

Re: [vdr] [feature request] recording length computation and storage

2011-08-19 Thread Udo Richter
Am 19.08.2011 15:30, schrieb Steffen Barszus: On 08/19/11 11:46, Steffen Barszus wrote: > i would like to request, that > vdr is storing the length of a recording and make it accessible > to the plug-ins. > > Where it gets stored is not my point, that it can be served from in > meo

Re: [vdr] [feature request] recording length computation and storage

2011-08-19 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:48:46 +0200 Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 19.08.2011 14:39, Steffen Barszus wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:21:24 +0200 > > Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > > > >> On 08/19/11 11:46, Steffen Barszus wrote: > >>> Hi ! > >>> > >>> After having seen that there are several plug-in

Re: [vdr] [feature request] recording length computation and storage

2011-08-19 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 19.08.2011 14:39, Steffen Barszus wrote: On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:21:24 +0200 Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 08/19/11 11:46, Steffen Barszus wrote: Hi ! After having seen that there are several plug-ins computing the recording length on their own and that being a very expensive task (in respec

Re: [vdr] [feature request] recording length computation and storage

2011-08-19 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:21:24 +0200 Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 08/19/11 11:46, Steffen Barszus wrote: > > Hi ! > > > > After having seen that there are several plug-ins computing the > > recording length on their own and that being a very expensive task > > (in respect of io and cpu) and also t

Re: [vdr] [feature request] recording length computation and storage

2011-08-19 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 08/19/11 11:46, Steffen Barszus wrote: Hi ! After having seen that there are several plug-ins computing the recording length on their own and that being a very expensive task (in respect of io and cpu) and also the same implementation needs to be copied over and over again, i would like to re

Re: [vdr] [feature request] recording length computation and storage

2011-08-19 Thread André Weidemann
Hi Steffen, On 19.08.2011 11:46, Steffen Barszus wrote: Hi ! After having seen that there are several plug-ins computing the recording length on their own and that being a very expensive task (in respect of io and cpu) and also the same implementation needs to be copied over and over again, i w

[vdr] [feature request] recording length computation and storage

2011-08-19 Thread Steffen Barszus
Hi ! After having seen that there are several plug-ins computing the recording length on their own and that being a very expensive task (in respect of io and cpu) and also the same implementation needs to be copied over and over again, i would like to request, that vdr is storing the length of a r