Re: [vdr] [VGA sync field] question to fb-radeon-intel.patch

2009-03-12 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Donnerstag, den 12.03.2009, 18:31 +0100 schrieb Thomas Hilber: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 06:15:04PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > > 1. In your patchset the patch fb-radeon-intel.patch [1] does include > > changes to drivers/video/intelfb/intelfbhw.c although in the install > > instructions [2] it

Re: [vdr] [VGA sync field] question to fb-radeon-intel.patch

2009-03-12 Thread Thomas Hilber
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:36:53PM +0100, Torgeir Veimo wrote: > Did you look into making your approach work with DirectFB yet? I don't think it's a big deal to port the Intel version of the FRC patch to DirectFB. But sorry, I don't use DirectFB. I can't see much advantage over a plain Xserver u

Re: [vdr] [VGA sync field] question to fb-radeon-intel.patch

2009-03-12 Thread Thomas Hilber
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:36:01PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > I hope, you have seen my message to linux-fbdev-devel [1]. I will try to > do what Krzysztof suggested, but will have to read more about that. > Maybe we get it into Linux kernel 2.6.30. yeah, I've seen that. > Should we continue dis

Re: [vdr] [VGA sync field] question to fb-radeon-intel.patch

2009-03-12 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On 12 Mar 2009, at 19:08, Thomas Hilber wrote: > I forgot to say patching the intelfb is only needed if you even want > to > run the linux console in VGA2SCART mode. Did you look into making your approach work with DirectFB yet? -- Torgeir Veimo torg...@pobox.com __

Re: [vdr] [VGA sync field] question to fb-radeon-intel.patch

2009-03-12 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Donnerstag, den 12.03.2009, 19:08 +0100 schrieb Thomas Hilber: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 06:31:47PM +0100, Thomas Hilber wrote: > > > a) Why is MIN_CLOCK set to 25000 in intelfbhw.h [3]? What would be the > > > downside of setting it to 1? > > > > MIN_CLOCK is set to 12000 by the patch. Wha

Re: [vdr] [VGA sync field] question to fb-radeon-intel.patch

2009-03-12 Thread Thomas Hilber
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 06:31:47PM +0100, Thomas Hilber wrote: > > a) Why is MIN_CLOCK set to 25000 in intelfbhw.h [3]? What would be the > > downside of setting it to 1? > > MIN_CLOCK is set to 12000 by the patch. What allows for SCART suitable > dotclocks. I don't know why the original drive

Re: [vdr] [VGA sync field] question to fb-radeon-intel.patch

2009-03-12 Thread Thomas Hilber
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 06:15:04PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > 1. In your patchset the patch fb-radeon-intel.patch [1] does include > changes to drivers/video/intelfb/intelfbhw.c although in the install > instructions [2] it is stated that intel drivers do not need to be > modified. sorry, install

[vdr] [VGA sync field] question to fb-radeon-intel.patch

2009-03-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Thomas, 1. In your patchset the patch fb-radeon-intel.patch [1] does include changes to drivers/video/intelfb/intelfbhw.c although in the install instructions [2] it is stated that intel drivers do not need to be modified. The changelog in 0.11 includes these two items. - patch against int