[PATCH]: [vdr] VDR & Multiple frontends (finished)

Eddi > -Messaggio originale- > Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di > Eddi > Inviato: sabato 10 febbraio 2007 11.17 > A: 'VDR Mailing List' > Oggetto: R: [PATCH]: [vdr] VDR & Multiple frontends, another try > > Hi, I've made anoth

R: [PATCH]: [vdr] VDR & Multiple frontends, another try

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto > di > > Klaus Schmidinger > > Inviato: venerdì 9 febbraio 2007 13.43 > > A: vdr@linuxtv.org > > Oggetto: Re: [PATCH]: [vdr] VDR & Multiple frontends > > > > Eddi wrote: > > > So what do you think should be the right way? >

R: [PATCH]: [vdr] VDR & Multiple frontends

pter0/frontend0 was to add the close fd_frontend to the dvb device destructor. Eddi > -Messaggio originale- > Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di > Klaus Schmidinger > Inviato: venerdì 9 febbraio 2007 13.43 > A: vdr@linuxtv.org > Oggetto: Re: [PATCH

Re: [PATCH]: [vdr] VDR & Multiple frontends

Eddi wrote: > So what do you think should be the right way? I haven't decided yet how to do that. I just wanted to let you know that deleting the cDvbDevice is not the way to go - especially if you delete it from within one of its own member functions ;-) It's no wonder your patched version fails